Charleston killings and targeted white people against whom he held race-based grudges.
But nobody is calling him a terrorist - just a nutter with a gun and a grudge.
So where, I wonder, does this leave those who claimed the killer in Charleston would have been labelled a terrorist had he not been white? Only it would seem to me that this case fundamentally disproves that rather silly argument.
some white people had been racist recently..... or he was just another American nutter with a gun
instantly lead to the shooter being labelled a terrorist, whereas the murder in Charleston did not because that shooter was white.
My point is that the reaction to this crime has conclusively proved this contention to be false.
It was a silly argument at the time and really a quite bizarre reaction to
a horrific event
was such a wrongheaded suggestion that I feel it's justified in this instance.
Americans are, without a doubt, the most f**ked up of all earthly organisms.
At least 30 minimum!
I thought that. Although that overabundance of teeth and uniform blonde hair that certain
American women sometimes have can make them all look pretty nondescript.
talk about chips on the shoulder - this bloke had a large portion of them....
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote