Reply With QuoteBecause nobody would be sad enough to want to go in. Same with Windsor Castle
Because nobody would be sad enough to want to go in. Same with Windsor Castle
If you pardon the pun
What with him being an evil dictator, and all.
Did you visit Romania during the period in question, j? I did, and I really didn't see much of a comparison between the rule of a brutal tyrant and the liberal benevolant parliamentary democracy with a mildly frosty old lady as its nominal figurehead.
Just as hardly anyone would refuse a trip to new york.
To suggest that the royal family is somehow drawing in millions of visitors who would go elsewhere in disgust if she didnt exist is utter nonsense.
That isnt why we should keep them. We should keep them because they are pointless and powerless and that is the job specification for a head of state unless they are also head of government.
has the leprechaun, you have the king or queen of england.
Posting Permissions
