Reply With Quotenot biased
I'll try and clear it up.
There were three players standing in offside positions, all in the goalkeeper's eyeline, one of whom let the f*cking thing run through his legs.
Why is there even any debate over this, unless Sakho is transparent Szczesny is going to lose sight of the ball for a fraction and it is then going to reappear, if this doesn't happen without the offside player (highly unlikely imo) then he is interfering.
You can clearly see Szczesny in a position to dive, as the bloke dummies it, I actually think there is a good chance he may have saved it.
not biased
It is the sheer fury that allardyce manages to muster that is slightly irritating. It is not, by any atretch of the imagination, a ridiculous decision nor is it even remotely baffling.
Or maybe it is if you have a ludicrously massive face and are a total c**t. I am afraid i wouldn't know
They definitely wouldn't have lost.
Good old sam
The goalie can't commit himself by diving to the right because he doesn't know if the player will get a nick. Never mind that the actual shot was eclipsed by one of the other offside players in the first place.
Why do SSN not explain this while they have Fat Sam whining about Arsenal's 'controversial' win on a continuous loop?
look at picture, you can clearly see he is in a position to dive but can't commit himself.
Well it shouldn't be difficult
Posting Permissions