Reply With QuoteOr, for that matter, that spending 30M+ on yet another attacking midfielder would have made addressing those issues any easier.
Or, for that matter, that spending 30M+ on yet another attacking midfielder would have made addressing those issues any easier.
Or was that your point
In fairness to people like SOLTARD and 7, at least their whinings are based in some logic.
This fellow just seems to be perpetually angry at everything. I suspect he gets wound up by his own choice of y-fronts every time he goes to the toilet.
And only a socialist would look at Cesc and say no, especially for the dubious reasoning of protecting the current crop from strong competition for a start.
If Cesc had been welcomed back, we would be a much stronger team.
How in any world is that a bad thing?
Also Chelsea wouldn't be enjoying his excellence, an aside yes, but one that we as fans can take some pleasure in.
And surely a capitalist would have a keener idea that if you spend 30m where it isn't so badly needed then you won't have that 30m to spend in a place where it is.
I can understand the sentimental attachment to Cesc, I don't share it though.
Remember how unhappy soltard was when we were winning stuff. He is positively beaming now.
Anything. He didnt solve the problems then, he wouldnt have done now.
It might not be a good reason not to buy him. The point is that it is ridiculous to keep bringing it up after every bad result, particulsrly when those bad results were caused by the issues that his signing wouldnt have changed.
By **** defending and an inability to do the ugly stuff.
Beautiful losers, to quote leonard cohen.
Imo, he is better than each and every one of the midfielders that we currently have. We would have needed to unload one of the current crop to get him in, though.
Posting Permissions