Much as it sticks in my craw to evince empathy for a Tory, I feel it is absurd

that Green's career is in ruins for simply doing what nearly every man does. In fact, any man that doesn't use the Interhole to occasionally browse pictures of the bare naked wimmins is a wrong'un or a butt-holer.

And this copper that is touted as some kind of 'Computer Forensics Expert' is nothing of the sort, as anyone that works in the Internet on a technical level will attest. He tried to imply that the presence of 'thousands' of thumbnails in Green's cache indicated thousands of visits to porn sites - total bóllocks. One click on a page and a thousand images can download and you don't even see, or know anything about them.

'Experts' in the police and judiciary rarely bear any kind of technical scrutiny because those agencies won't pay for real talent.* They gave evidence once some time ago, so they get asked again. Once they have testified for the prosecution two or three times their position as an 'expert' is cemented like some dangerously flawed circular argument.

*recent reports suggest GCHQ finally got their act together and hired some decent coders but I'd still take it with a pinch of salt.

Where can one aquire one of these laptops that secretly download porn?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Herbert Augustus Chapman

that Green's career is in ruins for simply doing what nearly every man does. In fact, any man that doesn't use the Interhole to occasionally browse pictures of the bare naked wimmins is a wrong'un or a butt-holer.

And this copper that is touted as some kind of 'Computer Forensics Expert' is nothing of the sort, as anyone that works in the Internet on a technical level will attest. He tried to imply that the presence of 'thousands' of thumbnails in Green's cache indicated thousands of visits to porn sites - total bóllocks. One click on a page and a thousand images can download and you don't even see, or know anything about them.

'Experts' in the police and judiciary rarely bear any kind of technical scrutiny because those agencies won't pay for real talent.* They gave evidence once some time ago, so they get asked again. Once they have testified for the prosecution two or three times their position as an 'expert' is cemented like some dangerously flawed circular argument.

*recent reports suggest GCHQ finally got their act together and hired some decent coders but I'd still take it with a pinch of salt.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Herbert Augustus Chapman

that Green's career is in ruins for simply doing what nearly every man does. In fact, any man that doesn't use the Interhole to occasionally browse pictures of the bare naked wimmins is a wrong'un or a butt-holer.

And this copper that is touted as some kind of 'Computer Forensics Expert' is nothing of the sort, as anyone that works in the Internet on a technical level will attest. He tried to imply that the presence of 'thousands' of thumbnails in Green's cache indicated thousands of visits to porn sites - total bóllocks. One click on a page and a thousand images can download and you don't even see, or know anything about them.

'Experts' in the police and judiciary rarely bear any kind of technical scrutiny because those agencies won't pay for real talent.* They gave evidence once some time ago, so they get asked again. Once they have testified for the prosecution two or three times their position as an 'expert' is cemented like some dangerously flawed circular argument.

*recent reports suggest GCHQ finally got their act together and hired some decent coders but I'd still take it with a pinch of salt.

---

His career isn't in ruins for doing what every man does. His career is in ruis because he was silly enough to get caught. :shrug:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Sir C

His career isn't in ruins for doing what every man does. His career is in ruis because he was silly enough to get caught. :shrug:

---

Indeed. Should’ve just used his mobile phone. The private browsing feature is wonderful.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Herbert Augustus Chapman

that Green's career is in ruins for simply doing what nearly every man does. In fact, any man that doesn't use the Interhole to occasionally browse pictures of the bare naked wimmins is a wrong'un or a butt-holer.

And this copper that is touted as some kind of 'Computer Forensics Expert' is nothing of the sort, as anyone that works in the Internet on a technical level will attest. He tried to imply that the presence of 'thousands' of thumbnails in Green's cache indicated thousands of visits to porn sites - total bóllocks. One click on a page and a thousand images can download and you don't even see, or know anything about them.

'Experts' in the police and judiciary rarely bear any kind of technical scrutiny because those agencies won't pay for real talent.* They gave evidence once some time ago, so they get asked again. Once they have testified for the prosecution two or three times their position as an 'expert' is cemented like some dangerously flawed circular argument.

*recent reports suggest GCHQ finally got their act together and hired some decent coders but I'd still take it with a pinch of salt.

---

Indeed. If it wasn't for the fact that the old ba stard will like as not walk onto the boards of several private institutions, or FTSE 100 companies inside of six months, I'd be equally sympathetic.
I mean, does any normal person just walk out of a job, while carrying a huge mortgage and kids to feed.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by 7sisters

Indeed. If it wasn't for the fact that the old ba stard will like as not walk onto the boards of several private institutions, or FTSE 100 companies inside of six months, I'd be equally sympathetic.
I mean, does any normal person just walk out of a job, while carrying a huge mortgage and kids to feed.

---

He's still a MP - I doubt he will starve

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Herbert Augustus Chapman

that Green's career is in ruins for simply doing what nearly every man does. In fact, any man that doesn't use the Interhole to occasionally browse pictures of the bare naked wimmins is a wrong'un or a butt-holer.

And this copper that is touted as some kind of 'Computer Forensics Expert' is nothing of the sort, as anyone that works in the Internet on a technical level will attest. He tried to imply that the presence of 'thousands' of thumbnails in Green's cache indicated thousands of visits to porn sites - total bóllocks. One click on a page and a thousand images can download and you don't even see, or know anything about them.

'Experts' in the police and judiciary rarely bear any kind of technical scrutiny because those agencies won't pay for real talent.* They gave evidence once some time ago, so they get asked again. Once they have testified for the prosecution two or three times their position as an 'expert' is cemented like some dangerously flawed circular argument.

*recent reports suggest GCHQ finally got their act together and hired some decent coders but I'd still take it with a pinch of salt.

---

Look, I am a Tory and think there are extremely serious questions that need to be asked about the behaviour of the Met. I also find Labour’s posturing on this utterly ludicrous given what they’ve been prepared to overlook from the likes of that repellent reptile Keith Vaz.

However, when you say it’s what every man does, I have to take issue. Do you know how many times in 20+ years of working I have accessed pornography via my work computer? Not once. Why? Because a/ it’s a creepy thing to do in the workplace and b/ because it’s gross misconduct and thus a sackable offence.

So on that level, I have zero sympathy for the silly cùnt.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Billy Goat Sverige

Indeed. Should’ve just used his mobile phone. The private browsing feature is wonderful.

---

Why don’t you tell me more of this feature, BGM? Does my iPhone have it?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Burney

Look, I am a Tory and think there are extremely serious questions that need to be asked about the behaviour of the Met. I also find Labour’s posturing on this utterly ludicrous given what they’ve been prepared to overlook from the likes of that repellent reptile Keith Vaz.

However, when you say it’s what every man does, I have to take issue. Do you know how many times in 20+ years of working I have accessed pornography via my work computer? Not once. Why? Because a/ it’s a creepy thing to do in the workplace and b/ because it’s gross misconduct and thus a sackable offence.

So on that level, I have zero sympathy for the silly cùnt.

---

I think the most pertinent question here is why on earth the parliamentary network allows one to access pornography?!

I’ve never tried it at work but judging my other things that are banned (YouTube for example), I would be staggered were it allowed.

He was browsing a more severe level of pornography Herbert, probably involving animals. Do you approve of animal porn Herbert? I must say, I am disgusted with you.