So we can add theatre to the list of things Mo knows nothing about

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Sir C

Is the primary purpose of theatre not to entertain, m? That being the case, if wes was entertained, the play was successful, for him at least.

---

Good lord - quite the radical idea there, sir c

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Luis Anaconda

Good lord - quite the radical idea there, sir c

---

Am I being naive, la? :-(

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Sir C

Am I being naive, la? :-(

---

African defending

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Sir C

Is the primary purpose of theatre not to entertain, m? That being the case, if wes was entertained, the play was successful, for him at least.

---

Could have fùcking fooled me.

Also, I would venture to suggest that WES would be entertained by watching chimps fling faeces. That does not ennoble the spectacle, however.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Burney

Could have fùcking fooled me.

Also, I would venture to suggest that WES would be entertained by watching chimps fling faeces. That does not ennoble the spectacle, however.

---

But Chimps are fun b, I mean watching those rip another one to bits at Kansas Zoo must have been entertaining

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Burney

Could have fùcking fooled me.

Also, I would venture to suggest that WES would be entertained by watching chimps fling faeces. That does not ennoble the spectacle, however.

---

Lots of people are enjoy going to the theatre and are entertained :shrug: Clearly, wes is no arbiter of ojective quality in any matter, but I simply don't believe one can apply objective standards to a piece of entertainment.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Pokster

But Chimps are fun b, I mean watching those rip another one to bits at Kansas Zoo must have been entertaining

---

Nasty bàstards, p. When they attack humans, they go first for the eyes and genitals, which seems a bit off to me.

Blind and dickiess is no way to go through life. :-(

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Sir C

Lots of people are enjoy going to the theatre and are entertained :shrug: Clearly, wes is no arbiter of ojective quality in any matter, but I simply don't believe one can apply objective standards to a piece of entertainment.

---

Except George Graham's 92-94 cup teams, of course.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Sir C

Lots of people are enjoy going to the theatre and are entertained :shrug: Clearly, wes is no arbiter of ojective quality in any matter, but I simply don't believe one can apply objective standards to a piece of entertainment.

---

We're not having this argument again. Clearly, Tolstoy is objectively better than Jackie Collins.

Also, I am prepared to bet that WES was largely there for the goatsex.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ash

Except George Graham's 92-94 cup teams, of course.

---

You're right, objectively I objected strongly to that dung ration.