counter attack by the team. But an absolutely lovely flick by Olly to start it.
Hasn't Olly scored something like 14 in his last 15 starts? I know we've looked much better with Alexis up front, but we shouldn't write off Olly just yet.
counter attack by the team. But an absolutely lovely flick by Olly to start it.
Hasn't Olly scored something like 14 in his last 15 starts? I know we've looked much better with Alexis up front, but we shouldn't write off Olly just yet.
http://arsenalist.com/f/2016-17/arse...iroud-1-0.html :clap::clap::clap::clap:
Limit of 4 smileys. WTF?
Every time you include a smiley in a message, a hamster dies McG. You heartless hogmanay bothering bástard.Quote:
Originally Posted by Mc Gooner
Fluuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuke!!!
Fück hamsters ....... metaphorically speaking you understand :dogs:Quote:
Originally Posted by 71 Guns - channeling the spirit of Mr Hat
It actually started when Lucas, helping out on the edge of our box, won the ball. Yet everyone keeps saying that Olly started the move. :shrug:Quote:
Originally Posted by Ganpati's Goonerz--AFC's Aboriginal Fertility Cult
Oh yeah. It was a great sliding interception by Lucas that started it. And Hector's pass. But it was Olly's backheel flick was the thing that really put the counter-attack on the front foot.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ash
Ollie started the attacking move. Beautiful flick. No-one seems to mention how Alexis' cross was such a dud. I've even heard it said it was Ollie's fault for being "too fast". Seems you can't win once people make up their minds about you.
"Ollie" and "too fast" are not things you normally see juxtapositioned in a sentence. :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Mo Britain less Europe
Still a fecking brilliant goal no matter how 'lucky' it was.
You make your luck. He missed a sitter and scored a glorious goal. He still gets shtick.