and yet he isn't. I find this odd.
and yet he isn't. I find this odd.
The reverse-jinx not working so far. :-(Quote:
Originally Posted by Burney
Yes. Mind you - like your mum - I do love de Kock.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ash
Seriously, though, his 50 on Saturday was the highlight of the day's play. Seriously good batsman.
indeed very puzzling. We need de Kock out reallyQuote:
Originally Posted by Burney
He and Amla are sort of quintessentially un-South African batsmen, aren't they? Alma's all great technique and elegant strokeplay, while de Kock is aggressive, but classy run-a-ball shenanigans. Gary Kirsten must be turning in his crypt.Quote:
Originally Posted by Luis Anaconda
yes - almost looking forward to watching them if I have to in a couple of weeks. As opposed to our brave boys. Saturday at the Oval. It will probably rainQuote:
Originally Posted by Burney
I actually became quite angry watching Cook, Jennings and Ballance poke about dismally against a depleted attack on what was still a belting track on a sunny Saturday afternoon in front of a full house as Lord's, every one of whom had paid a significant sum of money to be entertained. It was bloody disgraceful.Quote:
Originally Posted by Luis Anaconda
I actually cheered when Cook got out, assuming that some batting might come in. Didn't quite work out like that.Quote:
Originally Posted by Burney
He really is one of the dullest, most insipid and uninspiring batsmen I've ever seen play for England. He has the personality and appeal of a wet rag.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ash
Well, yes. It clearly wasn't a belting track at all as events proved. All these T20 fans like Berni thinking we should be scoring at 6 an over pfftQuote:
Originally Posted by Ash
It was at that stage, I assure you. And, with S. Africa's best bowler off the field, that should have been the time to capitalise. Instead Cook prodded and nudged at the thing as though it were a live hand grenade. ****.Quote:
Originally Posted by Luis Anaconda
A pitch does not deteriorate as quickly as that - clearly was difficult to bat on. Not like Cook isn't in good formQuote:
Originally Posted by Burney
A couple of hours earlier, Buvama and the nigh****chman had made comfortable progress, while de Kock was smashing it everywhere. There was nothing whatsoever wrong with the wicket.Quote:
Originally Posted by Luis Anaconda
:hehe: wd the censor. Nigh Twât ChmanQuote:
Originally Posted by Burney
In form players struggling to time it suggests otherwise followed by huge collapses the next day. Clearly was playing up a bit by the time of the evening sessionQuote:
Originally Posted by Burney
Well, Gary Ballance was able to stay in on it despite being notably shíte. Ergo, there was nowt wrong with it. I can honestly assure you that there was nothing happening.Quote:
Originally Posted by Luis Anaconda
whereas Sir Geoffrey was all fireworks wasn't he.....Quote:
Originally Posted by Burney
Christ almighty.....
He's quite feisty behind a microphone.Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter
Different era. This is a batsman-friendly time. No excuse for prodding about these days.Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter
Funny...you can find a lot of youtube clips of Boycott playing some pretty ugly shots. He isn't the prettiest to watch.Quote:
Originally Posted by Burney
That said, some of the wickets he is batting on look rather suspect.
Either way....lets not criticise a batsman for scoring slowly. Its silly. Some of my best innings were my slowest.
There's nothing wrong with scoring slowly if the context of the match demands it. A rather more adventurous approach would have been perfectly appropriate on Saturday afternoon. Instead, Cook decided - as ever - to grind it out.Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter
Boycs wasn't always the prettiest, but that wasn't his job. He had superb defensive technique, which meant he was a bástard to dislodge. Cook doesn't have superb defensive technique - he's just dull.