100 goals for the club.
398 appearances.
and we don't appear to mind him leaving in the slightest.
Printable View
100 goals for the club.
398 appearances.
and we don't appear to mind him leaving in the slightest.
Ornstein has just tweeted.Quote:
Originally Posted by IUFG
:shrug: I always rather liked him but do think he's gone stale. He needs a fresh challenge and it frees up £100k per week
Tweeted what?Quote:
Originally Posted by PSRB
That he's gone from Arsenal and is an Everton playerQuote:
Originally Posted by Ash
seems to be a decent lad too...no off the field dramas to speak off...with the same girl for so long.
Good luck to him.
Quite like Sam Allardyce...very underrated coach who revived a lot of careers in his time...Jay Jay, Bruno N’Gotty, Djorkaeff, Campo etc etc
If he can’t get Theo to play again then there’s no hope for the lad.
They all were ages ago, Tony. Who has he helped more recently?Quote:
Originally Posted by Tony C
Not that I'm saying he's not a decent coach, as far as his teams go.
West Ham United, Sunderland and Crystal Palace, Not to mention England FC.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ash
I was after players, rather than teams.Quote:
Originally Posted by redgunamo
Shame we never got to see what he might have done with England. Can't have been as bad to watch as under Southgate.
Presumably, those teams do have some players.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ash
I agree about England, but I do wonder now, whether he may have been tempted to be too Allardyce, just to rub everyone's nose in it, as the man said.
Disaster.
Anyway, more disaster.
Further disaster.
Unending disaster.
I can't be the only one who thinks we should have sacked off Welbeck before Theo?Quote:
Originally Posted by Tony C
There is at least the possibility that Welbeck might improve.Quote:
Originally Posted by PSRB
Yeah, but you need a goalscorer :-\Quote:
Originally Posted by PSRB
I suppose Welbeck, such as he is, is of more use to us than a non-playing Theo is.
loooooooool.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ash
I'm amazed we got a fee for him given he was due a testimonial (they are rare these days, because few players stay at a club long enough to 'earn' one).
He/his advisers could have just said he would sit on the rest of his fat contract unless we waived a transfer fee which would have allowed him to pocket a massive signing-on fee in lieu. Just for once, we haven't been mugged off.
I think we move Walcott on before Welbeck. Not by much though.Quote:
Originally Posted by PSRB
I do seem to recall Wenger being at the vatican when Welbeck signed and said that he would not have signed Welbeck were he about, or words to that effect?