were morally equivalent. :-(
I had to point out that that logic only held good if you took the view that the Nazis' and the Allies' reasons for waging war were morally equivalent.
Seriously, what the fùck is wrong with people these days?
were morally equivalent. :-(
I had to point out that that logic only held good if you took the view that the Nazis' and the Allies' reasons for waging war were morally equivalent.
Seriously, what the fùck is wrong with people these days?
There have always been idiots, the internet just gives you a chance to encounter them more often.
The problem is, the loonies get heard and their view gradually becomes mainstream. I mean, whilst we've always had nutters, we used to take it as read that a person with a ***** is a man, whatever he calls himself. Now the opinions of the mental cases are so widespread that a man calling himself Mildred is treated as a woman, and suggesting otherwise can be construed as a criminal offence.
Dear Lord, please snd a flood to wash away the filth with which we have covered your creation, amen.
Pretty much on par with holocaust.
I don't think they do, I can't think of something as obviously wrong as the Nazi/Allies equivalence view that has become mainstream. Can you?
As for the gender fluidity thing, I can't get excited about something that (as far as I can see) isn't really hurting anybody.
Well, it's still socially unacceptable to wave a swastika around, but a hammer and sickle is apparently perfectly fine.
It's not that gender fluidity hurts anyone (except, of course, when people are persecuted for wrongthink) - it's that we are being bullied into accepting and repeating a lie.
A man in a dress is not a woman. I could be interviewed and possibly cautioned by the police for saying that. Don't you find that disturbing?
Wasn't the hammer and sickle more popular 30 years ago than it is now? I think we are more aware of the atrocities committed by Stalin (and co) now, than we were in the 80s.
If someone was cautioned for saying a man in a dress isn't a woman (and no more) that would be disturbing. I agree. If it happened regularly, then we'd have a real problem.