Rather than look back in fondness it made me sad :-(
why is this? that team should have done more :-(
Printable View
Rather than look back in fondness it made me sad :-(
why is this? that team should have done more :-(
The absence of a European triumph, or indeed coming close, is often held up as a reason to knock them.Quote:
Originally Posted by Pat Vegas
or not winning back-to-back titlesQuote:
Originally Posted by SWv2
The European thing doesn't bother me. What bothers me is the number of leagues United won between 1998 and 2004.Quote:
Originally Posted by SWv2
Indeed, a real failure in my book.Quote:
Originally Posted by IUFG
In the past we seemed to win a title then rest on our laurels as such instead of using the success as a basis for aggressive strengthening. Of course one has to acknowledge that winning the thing is difficult enough in the first place, to retain it would merely be rubber stamping the team's dominance.
Well documented on here that I am no huge fan of Europe apart from in an economic, social and cultural perspective.Quote:
Originally Posted by Burney
One’s domestic league title is always and will always be the first priority to me. We had scattered success in this respect as opposed to sustained.
Certainly 1 was allowed to slip in the period you reference.
Presumably we can use this as another stick with which to bash Arsene?Quote:
Originally Posted by SWv2
:nod: It's telling, in fact, that during what we like to call our period of dominance, United won just as many leagues as we did.Quote:
Originally Posted by SWv2
Well they are a significantly bigger club. What constitutes dominance for us is average for them.Quote:
Originally Posted by Burney
SWv2 "The absence of a European triumph, or indeed coming close, is often held up as a reason to knock them."
It really was a missed opportunity given the teams which reached the Semi-Final that year
And going out to a Wayne Bridge winner in that Quarter at Highbury... :shout: :cry:
A CL in 04 and another in 06 would have suited me
Of course, the question is whether we could have sustained our league performance if we'd still been in the CL?Quote:
Originally Posted by Viva Prat Vegas
That year Chelsea knocked us out was our year and pretty pivotal to the future of European football.
Chelsea played Monaco in the Semi Final but Ranieri found a way to lose but then a young Jose Mourinho masterminded a famous win for Porto in the final...next up was his victory lap around Europe with Chelsea, Real and Inter and years of endless Arsene torment.
:shrug:
Should have got the job done that year imo
It’s part of the reason I just can’t see us winning the EL.
After witnessing stuff like the above, Galatasary in the UEFA, Paris in 06, Birmingham in the Carling Cup...I just think we’ll find a way to screw it up.
We’ll probably beat Atlético 5-0 over the 2 legs then lose on penalties to Salzburg in the final :nod:
That's true if you ignore the 25 year period during which they didn't win the league once and were relegated.Quote:
Originally Posted by Rich
New to football, Rich?
I think he is, wes. This moment was obviously sweet for the Citeh fans...Quote:
Originally Posted by World's End Stella
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e8HQhV3ujyg
Can you imagine Vieira or McLintock relegating us, IUFG? Me, neither. :-)Quote:
Originally Posted by IUFG
That really is quite, quite beautiful. :cloud9:
Not winning the CL in 2004 annoys me more than than Henry fvcking up vs Barca. 2004 was the year we should have won it.Quote:
Originally Posted by Burney
I wouldn't swap it for the Invincibles year, tbh. And it might have come down to an either/or between the two.Quote:
Originally Posted by PSRB
I find this course of events perversely amusing. Although a 3-1 victory over Madrid sounds more plausible.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tony C
For some reason the 2002/2003 screw up hurts me the most. It would have been three in a row. :-(Quote:
Originally Posted by PSRB
But possibly gave us the sense of injustice that led to the Invincibles year? Three in a row, or two out of three and an invincible year?Quote:
Originally Posted by World's End Stella
3 in a row and the invincibles, AFCE. :-)Quote:
Originally Posted by AFC East
I'm a greedy f*cker.
**** it, let's have the CL in 2004 as well.Quote:
Originally Posted by World's End Stella
We'd probably still just as miserable about finishing 6th/7th :-(
I take your point as 2004 was a much better team, however beating Chelsea would have meant us having to avoid ****ing up for 3 more matches, 180 minutes. Who knows how we would have coped with the remaining games and team rotation.Quote:
Originally Posted by PSRB
Jeremie Aliadiere to start up top. Blimey.
Henry scoring that chance meant 20 minutes and surely victory?
The circumstances of 2004 certainly hurt more as we utterly blew it, Paris was more a sense of disbelief that we were actually winning.
Henrik Fúcking LarssonQuote:
Originally Posted by SWv2
Manuel Fúcking Almunia :-(
God was I drunk that night. The George Abbott in Guildford's fault. I fancied lager and they only had Fosters and Stella so I ingeniously decided that watching the CL final and swilling endless pints of Stella was a good idea.Quote:
Originally Posted by IUFG
I can still recall the look on the Chinese woman's face at the chippy as I ordered. Not sure what she was more worried about, my ability to take my wallet out and pay or the likelihood that I was about to fall into the glass window behind me. :-(
I miss the 5.2% Stella. :cry:Quote:
Originally Posted by World's End Stella
They did plenty, imo. As a rule, we are not greedy supporters.Quote:
Originally Posted by Pat Vegas
Jens Lehmann :-(Quote:
Originally Posted by IUFG