Depends how well the conscripts are trained. The German army in both world wars were largely made up of conscripts. They didn't run much.
Any capitalist system requires for its own survival a large underclass. They have to be kept poor and hungry to keep them desperate for work so the likes of you can live it up and look down your nose at them.
I do apologise if not enough of them died and I formally apologise for my own family surviving and going on to breed a new generation of lefties. The lefties that are going to murder you in your bed as soon as Comrade Corbyn seizes power.
You should be scared.
In the meantime, I have a powerful scotch bonnet sauce that I highly recommend. It really clears out the sinuses :)
We are not arguing over whether they run but over why they dont.
All the armies in boththose wars were made up almost exclusively ofconscripts or 'volunteers'. Very few professional soldiers.
Germans deserted in their droves at various stages on the Eastern front and I dont ****ing blame them. Fighting the russians on their own turf is worse than trying to win a test series in India.
Large-scale desertion didn't start on the Eastern Front until very late in the war. That was because the Germans had started to replace their effective troops with children, crocks and old men who had received minimal training and were led by inexperienced officers and NCOs.
However, for the most part, experienced conscripts fought just as well as anyone else. Not running is about morale, training, discipline and comradeship rather than how one got into the army in the first place.