of thing more than a little bit nauseating. :-(
Does this make me a bad person?
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz...er_dailymailUK
Printable View
of thing more than a little bit nauseating. :-(
Does this make me a bad person?
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz...er_dailymailUK
I think it's perfectly delightful and charming that they've found a way to reduce the miracle of life to a scientific and economic convenience, and sincerely hope God belesses their union, just before he sends a flood to sweep this whole disgusting, sick, filthy society away. :-(Quote:
Originally Posted by Burney
I don't really understand why the bumders would want to have kids, tbh. Don't they realise that the fact that they can't conceive and therefore suffer no biological or societal pressure to have kids is one of the major selling points of sodomy?Quote:
Originally Posted by Sir C
It’s the kid I feel sorry for. I often wonder what the world will be like a hundred years from now after all the queers and lesbians have released a whole generation of gender neutral beings into the world.Quote:
Originally Posted by Burney
Well, obviously. Finding the idea of gay people kissing is pretty nauseating to most straight people, so it's hardly surprising that the idea of them having a baby 'together' is also.Quote:
Originally Posted by Burney
The question is, once we've put our entirely natural, reflexive disgust to one side, are we left with any legitimate moral or ethical reason for objecting to two fellas bringing up a baby?
The gay chaps whose wedding I'm going to in May have just 'fallen pregnant' (i.e. paid $80,000 for a surrogate mother in America).
The child is going to grow up believing that bumming is a valid lifestyle choice.Quote:
Originally Posted by Monty92
It's degenarate filth and an insult to the Lord.
:nod: The fact that a chap likes cock ought to my mind be treated much as one might an unsightly facial growth or a speech impediment. One should be kind, respectful and tolerant of the aberration and endeavour to treat its victim as one would anyone else. However, that does not require us to celebrate the unfortunate business or pretend that it is in any sense a desirable condition.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sir C
I think it's the transaction that makes me particularly uncomfortable. Treating a woman as a mere vessel for children feels a touch medieval to me.Quote:
Originally Posted by Monty92
and adoption is just a terrible, terrible idea all round, isn't it?
I mean, not for the kid, necessarily, but the people who adopt them.
Who the fúck would take on a child with whom you share no biological kinship and is virtually guaranteed to grow up psychologically dysfunctional?
Mental...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Burney
Attachment 869Quote:
Originally Posted by Sir C
Who do think started all this nonsense?
:nod: All the people I've known who've been adopted have been a bit fücked up about it imo.Quote:
Originally Posted by Monty92
It's alright once they get older - but in the early years adopted kids are invariably violent and impossible to socialise because of whatever traumas they suffered under their biological parents.Quote:
Originally Posted by Burney
I mean, my kids are being brought up in the leafy middle class environs of Hampstead with two blissfully happy and successful parents, and every single day I amaze myself that I've not killed at least one of them. So I can only imagine what it's like to have to care for a truly dysfunctional child who doesn't even share my DNA.
I know a couple with adopted kids. I've tried to chat to the boy, aged around 7, and literally all he does is hiss at me. I basically don't bother any more.
Ooh, you wouldn't want one that's any older than toddler age, would you? Christ knows what's happened to them. Damaged goods.Quote:
Originally Posted by Monty92
And let's be honest, while there are obviously many examples of intelligent and successful adoptees, the odds are that they're not going to come of particularly good stock. I've known people who wouldn't buy a dog without knowing its lineage, so the idea of adopting a human with absolutely zero idea of what kind of horrors lurk in its DNA seems enormously risky.
do in the bedroom, in addition to being consensual, is entirely our business.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sir C
I saw a couple of poofs having a wee smooch yesterday as they parted ways.Quote:
Originally Posted by Monty92
Didn't bother me at all as I was entirely focused on getting to the Burrito place. Good luck to the poofs.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Burney
Those gold trousers :hehe:
I'm no homophobe but the idea of gay men doing anything remotely sexual is far from palatable. Of course, women on the other hand....
Yes. That's the normal reaction. Not for sw, however. He loves to watch them tucking into one another (probably while touching himself through his trouser pocket, the dirty old sod).Quote:
Originally Posted by Alberto Balsam Rodriguez
Quote:
Originally Posted by Burney
As you know, I too have no problem with the homos. It doesnt matter to me where a chap chooses to bury his treasure.
that said, I do find it incredibly boring when they feel the need to talk about it incessantly and allow themselves to be defined by it. Imagine how boring straight men. Are when they do nothing but talk about 'pulling birds' and how much fanny they get.
I am quite comfortable being around bum bandits but the accent and affectation is quite frankly ****ing annoying. the sheer fabulousness of it all.
Precisely. Live and let live etc. Obviously bumming in the streets is not acceptable but that is purely a matter of public decency. A smooch, within reason, is not something that should rob someone of their lunch.Quote:
Originally Posted by SWv2
Yes. I think the problem arose when the desire to whop it up another chap's chuffbox became seen not simply as a sexual proclivity, but as an entire 'lifestyle'.Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter
It's odd, really. We do not seek to make a lifestyle out of other perversions, after all. We don't talk about the 'auto-asphyxiation community', have magazines like 'Foot Fetishist Times' or see marches for 'Bestiality Pride', do we?
Fundamentally, if you'll forgive the pun, a chap who wishes to put his peter in another man's dung isn't quite the thing, is he? Now we, as gentlemen, are inclined to allow a fellow his quirks, so long as he keeps them discreet. A man might wear brown shoes in town, for example - one wouldn't ostracise him for it, so long as he only did it the once and didn't draw attention to it.Quote:
Originally Posted by Burney
Yes, I saw a film once where a lady touched another lady's boobs. It made my tummy feel funny.Quote:
Originally Posted by Alberto Balsam Rodriguez
A smooch is one thing. That could easily be mistaken for that foul foreign thing of men kissing one another in greeting. Tongue sandwiches, on the other hand, make me want to heave.Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter
This appears to be a rather long winded way of saying 'one up the bum, no harm done'.....Quote:
Originally Posted by Sir C
I dont particularly want to watch heterosexual couples do that either. It isnt a good look.Quote:
Originally Posted by Burney
Looooool he was really a batty boy?
I remember him saying he was seeing a dude but thought it was him click baiting on social media :shrug:
Now he’s married to a dude and having a baby wtf???
#StopPersecutingBermuda
Imagine growing up with 2 dads, of which neither is your real father and they're also poofs.Quote:
Originally Posted by Burney
Fúck knows how that will affect the poor kid...
Probably less than growing up in a broken home or if your dad was a wife beater imoQuote:
Originally Posted by barrybueno
Both of those could still happen though (change wife to husband obv)Quote:
Originally Posted by Pokster
Might end up a Gooner! :hide: