with what she describes as her 'first' child (presumably a period where her income was provided at least in part by her previous employer in return for fùck all) seems to think I should employ her.
Yes. I'll just sign my employer up to pay for your next kid shall I, love? :hehe:
Bin.
Kick that skank to the curb!Quote:
Originally Posted by Burney
Quote:
Originally Posted by Burney
She actually put that in her CV? What a moron...
Women are dangerous things to employ. Apart from young ones who are a bit of eye candy I don't know why companies bother with them. Under 25 or 40 works I guessQuote:
Originally Posted by Burney
I think she is setting you up for a landmark discrimination case B ...the fems have carefully selected you from years of trolling in The Guardian comment section ...dont worry though , Awimbs massive membership will gofund your defence . Oooh...Quote:
Originally Posted by Burney
:hehe: You homos! You've really played yourselves, haven't you. You chaps all want your birds out on the street earning a living, because .. Women's Lib and whatnot. Not to mention helping you all pay your bills. But, at the same time, you've actually managed to make women qua women practically unemployable.
loooooool, as The Man said.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Burney