I see things are now at the stage where men are being required to undergo the ritual

Printable View

10-20-2017, 11:09 AM
Burney

I see things are now at the stage where men are being required to undergo the ritual

public humiliation of a confession of every sexually inappropriate thing they've ever done in order to appease the 'Me Too' witch hunt. Even having to publicly admit in a national newspaper that you've consumed 'sexist' pornography (there's another kind?). :hehe:

Nothing at all weird or unsettling about that. Oh, no. It's not at all cultural revolution-ey.

https://www.theguardian.com/commenti...-me-too-sexism
10-20-2017, 11:16 AM
The Rob2

corr not me

I read about so many crimes that were just banter in my day

#notme
10-20-2017, 11:18 AM
Burney

Quote:

Originally Posted by the rob2

corr not me

i read about so many crimes that were just banter in my day

#notme

Admit that you once may have looked down a girl's top, you abuser! Confess! Confess!
10-20-2017, 12:05 PM
IUFG

Quote:

Originally Posted by Burney

Admit that you once may have looked down a girl's top, you abuser! Confess! Confess!

I did shake my head when he confessed to "There were more times when I stared at women inappropriately. Once I even dared to tell a classmate I had been looking at her chest."

**** me, is looking the new sexual assault?
10-20-2017, 12:13 PM
Peter

Quote:

Originally Posted by Burney

public humiliation of a confession of every sexually inappropriate thing they've ever done in order to appease the 'Me Too' witch hunt. Even having to publicly admit in a national newspaper that you've consumed 'sexist' pornography (there's another kind?). :hehe:

Nothing at all weird or unsettling about that. Oh, no. It's not at all cultural revolution-ey.

https://www.theguardian.com/commenti...-me-too-sexism

Unlearning, how appropriate.

Just out of interest, the article shows a sign that says 'C*nt touch this'.......it doesnt appear to make sense.

I am happy to admit that I have looked at women's bodies. I have tried to be subtle about it but have apparently failed to be on many occasions.

I wish I could say that I was sorry and that it will never happen again but I am afraid it just isn't true. I will do it again.
10-20-2017, 12:14 PM
Peter

Quote:

Originally Posted by IUFG

I did shake my head when he confessed to "There were more times when I stared at women inappropriately. Once I even dared to tell a classmate I had been looking at her chest."

**** me, is looking the new sexual assault?

There is a difference between having a look and saying 'I am looking at your tits' .....
10-20-2017, 12:18 PM
IUFG

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter

There is a difference between having a look and saying 'I am looking at your tits' .....

Yes, of course. But why he would say this to a woman, I have no idea.

I'm sure she was aware of this, without him pointing it out.
10-20-2017, 12:22 PM
Sir C

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter

Unlearning, how appropriate.

Just out of interest, the article shows a sign that says 'C*nt touch this'.......it doesnt appear to make sense.

I am happy to admit that I have looked at women's bodies. I have tried to be subtle about it but have apparently failed to be on many occasions.

I wish I could say that I was sorry and that it will never happen again but I am afraid it just isn't true. I will do it again.

It's the bottoms that get me, p. :sigh:
10-20-2017, 12:25 PM
Burney

Quote:

Originally Posted by IUFG

Yes, of course. But why he would say this to a woman, I have no idea.

I'm sure she was aware of this, without him pointing it out.

I don’t think anyone realises this yet, but he reads like a man suffering severe sexual repression. His ‘confession’ sounds exactly the same as someone who’s been indoctrinated by a religion to feel ashamed of his entirely natural sexual instincts.

Well it’s not like ideologies that demand sexual shame from men ever end badly, is it? :rolleyes:
10-20-2017, 12:28 PM
IUFG

Quote:

Originally Posted by Burney

I don’t think anyone realises this yet, but he reads like a man suffering severe sexual repression.

he reads like a man who is a complete and utter wet.

The sort that orders a small Chardonnay at the bar.
10-20-2017, 12:29 PM
Burney

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sir C

It's the bottoms that get me, p. :sigh:

Yes. Breasts are the snare if the younger, less inexperienced fellow, I think.

Arses, on the other hand...arses. Yes....Mmmmm.

Sorry, what were we talking about?
10-20-2017, 12:33 PM
Sir C

Quote:

Originally Posted by Burney

Yes. Breasts are the snare if the younger, less inexperienced fellow, I think.

Arses, on the other hand...arses. Yes....Mmmmm.

Sorry, what were we talking about?

Kinckers knackers knockers!
10-20-2017, 12:34 PM
Burney

Quote:

Originally Posted by IUFG

he reads like a man who is a complete and utter wet.

The sort that orders a small Chardonnay at the bar.

I saw a hilarious thread on twitter where a silly **** in a hat who claims to be a female must ally was proudly saying he never flirts because he doesn’t ‘want to be that guy’ - and then complaining that he never gets anywhere with women :hehe:
10-20-2017, 12:35 PM
redgunamo

Pornography empowers women, I thought they said? :-(

Quote:

Originally Posted by Burney

public humiliation of a confession of every sexually inappropriate thing they've ever done in order to appease the 'Me Too' witch hunt. Even having to publicly admit in a national newspaper that you've consumed 'sexist' pornography (there's another kind?). :hehe:

Nothing at all weird or unsettling about that. Oh, no. It's not at all cultural revolution-ey.

https://www.theguardian.com/commenti...-me-too-sexism

Finally an industry in which the dollies command better pay than the blokes :shrug:
10-20-2017, 12:36 PM
Sir C

Quote:

Originally Posted by Burney

I saw a hilarious thread on twitter where a silly **** in a hat who claims to be a feminist ally was proudly saying he never flirts because he doesn’t ‘want to be that guy’ - and then complaining that he never gets anywhere with women :hehe:

It's a point, though. Imagine being single again and, God forbid, young. How would you start a conversation with a woman without being accused of some sort of assault?
10-20-2017, 12:37 PM
Burney

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sir C

Kinckers knackers knockers!

Of course, arses are also good because - unlike tits - you can gawp at them to your heart’s content without the object of your attention noticing. With breasts, you have to be subtle :nod:

Oh, god! I’m basically Harvey Weinstein, aren’t I? :-(
10-20-2017, 12:38 PM
IUFG

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sir C

It's a point, though. Imagine being single again and, God forbid, young. How would you start a conversation with a woman without being accused of some sort of assault?

It is all about the apps nowadays, sc.

They go in pubs, open the app and see who is available.

In other words, you can now be rejected without ever speaking to the person.
10-20-2017, 12:39 PM
redgunamo

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sir C

It's a point, though. Imagine being single again and, God forbid, young. How would you start a conversation with a woman without being accused of some sort of assault?

Simply by having been brought up right, I think.
10-20-2017, 12:41 PM
Burney

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sir C

It's a point, though. Imagine being single again and, God forbid, young. How would you start a conversation with a woman without being accused of some sort of assault?

I think it’d be OK. Most people are still sane, I think - it’s just that the loonies are given credence.
10-20-2017, 12:41 PM
Burney

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sir C

It's a point, though. Imagine being single again and, God forbid, young. How would you start a conversation with a woman without being accused of some sort of assault?

I think it’d be OK. Most people are still sane, I think - it’s just that the loonies are given credence.
10-20-2017, 01:05 PM
Pokster

Quote:

Originally Posted by Burney

Of course, arses are also good because - unlike tits - you can gawp at them to your heart’s content without the object of your attention noticing. With breasts, you have to be subtle :nod:

Oh, god! I’m basically Harvey Weinstein, aren’t I? :-(

No, he had loads of women, you are almost a virgin in comparison
10-20-2017, 01:09 PM
PSRB

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sir C

It's the bottoms that get me, p. :sigh:

Legs for me
10-20-2017, 01:10 PM
Sir C

Quote:

Originally Posted by PSRB

Legs for me

I'll save some for you :thumbup:
10-20-2017, 01:51 PM
Peter

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sir C

I'll save some for you :thumbup:

One may as well have a glance at the whole thing.
10-20-2017, 02:22 PM
redgunamo

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter

One may as well have a glance at the whole thing.

Indeed, P. The IPSF is on the case, as we speak

http://www.bbc.com/sport/41652997

All times are GMT. The time now is 06:07 AM.