They were everywhere in the 70s and 80s, but they his headline reminded me how much I love and miss the phrase. I mean, it's also funny as fúck, obviously.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics...ed-sex-maniac/
Printable View
They were everywhere in the 70s and 80s, but they his headline reminded me how much I love and miss the phrase. I mean, it's also funny as fúck, obviously.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics...ed-sex-maniac/
Am I missing something when I read some commentators suggest Rory Stewart is the biggest threat to Johnson?Quote:
Originally Posted by Burney
I mean, short of a major scandal breaking that would force Johnson to withdraw, he *will* make the final two. And if it's Johnson vs Stewart, it's pretty much a scientific FACT that the membership would vote overwhelmingly for Johnson. :shrug:
No, you're not missing anything other than the fact that he appeals to such commentators because they are not tories and in many cases actively hate everything about the tories. Stewart is simply positioning himself as the acceptable face of Remain in what under Johnson will be a Brexiteer's Tory Party and thus is seeking to carve out a party within a party - the new ERG, if you like.Quote:
Originally Posted by Monty92
I'm a massive, massive fan of Stewart's plan to put Brexit back to the people via a citizens' assembly - except if the people then decide we should leave with No Deal, he won't accept their answer :clap:Quote:
Originally Posted by Burney
Exactly. The shocking thing is that, when he said that, he wasn't challenged about it by the interviewer.Quote:
Originally Posted by Monty92
He is quite simply a de haut en bas, we-know-best remainer masquerading as a man of the people and babbling in Pashtu.
Only your mumQuote:
Originally Posted by Burney
You do.Quote:
Originally Posted by Burney
They happen to be 20-something female teachers 'seducing' teenage schoolboys...
And in other news.... those cheeky scousers. you gotta love 'em
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england...yside-48647788
Oh, you still get 'em, but they aren't called 'sex maniacs' anymore, which seems a pity. Besides, since when has a chap liking to put it about a bit constituted sex maniac status? Seems a very low bar to entry - as it were.Quote:
Originally Posted by IUFG
As for the other thing, scousers gonna scouse. :shrug:
IAHYK - in all honesty, it's all too much effortQuote:
Originally Posted by Burney
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/av/uk-eng...-wasn-t-enough
Enjoy....
At her height getting pounded 5 times a day wasn’t enough :clap:
Pretty thing too...
I like the fact that she moved to France in order to stop having sex. :hehe:Quote:
Originally Posted by Tony C
Yes. There's a lot to be said for the old Sophocles thing of no longer being chained to a madman.Quote:
Originally Posted by PSRB
This place has really gone downhill, we are meant to have rules you know. Pictures please!Quote:
Originally Posted by IUFG
https://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2014...73_634x630.jpgQuote:
Originally Posted by Maravilloso Marvo
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...ical-Fame.html
https://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2011...10_468x579.jpg
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...ail-judge.html
https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2019/02...0175971292.jpg
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...sex-romps.html
3, 1, 2 obviouslyQuote:
Originally Posted by IUFG
Sex maniac? Right here :thumbup:Quote:
Originally Posted by PSRB
Quite right, I wonder if number 3's lawyer could join in as well?Quote:
Originally Posted by PSRB