Loooooool
Don’t think I’ve seen anyone make Khan look like a chump imo
Brutal....
Printable View
Loooooool
Don’t think I’ve seen anyone make Khan look like a chump imo
Brutal....
Niave African bowling there CliveQuote:
Originally Posted by Tony C
The 'Ghanis are gonna win now we dropped that chance at slip. Just you watch.Quote:
Originally Posted by Pokster
We should have declared after 40 overs just for the bantz imoQuote:
Originally Posted by Ganpati's Goonerz--AFC's Aboriginal Fertility Cult
They were only 17 runs behind us after 35 overs.Quote:
Originally Posted by barrybueno
The acceleration at the end was mental.
Though if we get to 500 in the 48th over vs Aus, I'm up for it.
I was there, the Afghan's chase was pretty pathetic. 157 off the last ball.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tony C
What did Archer and Woods look like in the flesh? And was Vince the usual?Quote:
Originally Posted by PSRB
I can't believe we have Dawson not Hales in the squad. Taking drugs is not as bad as taking a belt-sander to the ball. We could really use him atm.
It would be great if Moeen hit top form, as his little cameo looked good. In Roy's absence, open with Moeen and play an extra quick, like Plunkett or Curran. We bat so deep.
Oh, and what's your take on Stokes's bowling. There have been a couple of games like yesterday when he was given a few over that were inexpensive. If one bowler is getting tonked, and Stoke's first 3 overs go for just 4 rpo, why not keep bowling him.
I believe the Hales thing is more to do with him lying to Morgan and the team, there's certainly a deeper reason as to why he wasn't selected than just the drugs.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ganpati's Goonerz--AFC's Aboriginal Fertility Cult
Archer and Wood are frighteningly fast up close, oddly TV really doesn't do it justice as too quite how fast they are.
Vince just won't threaten Roy's place once he's fit. Nice replacement but not 1st XI
Agree with Stokes but just think they're worried about breaking him