My interest in this story doesn't really extend beyond the attractiveness

of the protagonist.

She's just ruddy lovely, isn't she?

http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/v...ts-issue-video

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Monty92

of the protagonist.

She's just ruddy lovely, isn't she?

http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/v...ts-issue-video

---

She's got a massive wart and a bigger attitude problem. She's probably a lesbian, or a feminazi, or a transer.

**** her and her flat shoes in the ear.

:hehe: + extra characters.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Sir C

She's got a massive wart and a bigger attitude problem. She's probably a lesbian, or a feminazi, or a transer.

**** her and her flat shoes in the ear.

---

Easy with the triggering language, dude!

Surely she's a prime candidate for your leftie **** fest? A social justice warrior AND attractive. You don't get many of them knocking around.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Sir C

She's got a massive wart and a bigger attitude problem. She's probably a lesbian, or a feminazi, or a transer.

**** her and her flat shoes in the ear.

---

I quite like that after 45secs, the cameraperson gets bored and just points the camera at her tits

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Monty92

of the protagonist.

She's just ruddy lovely, isn't she?

http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/v...ts-issue-video

---

Oh, hang on - So I am not required to wear a suit to work, then? Perhaps I'll wear an MCC blazer and slacks instead.

It's quite right that an organisation would want their receptionist to appear to fit a certain image, for goodness sake.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Monty92

Easy with the triggering language, dude!

Surely she's a prime candidate for your leftie **** fest? A social justice warrior AND attractive. You don't get many of them knocking around.

---

I need them to be ugly to feed my anger as I'm doing it.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Rich

Oh, hang on - So I am not required to wear a suit to work, then? Perhaps I'll wear an MCC blazer and slacks instead.

It's quite right that an organisation would want their receptionist to appear to fit a certain image, for goodness sake.

---

Slacks. :redcard:

Do you have to wear high heels to work though?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Rich

Oh, hang on - So I am not required to wear a suit to work, then? Perhaps I'll wear an MCC blazer and slacks instead.

It's quite right that an organisation would want their receptionist to appear to fit a certain image, for goodness sake.

---

I find it helps to process this post if you read it in the voice of Jacob Rees-Mogg

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ash

Slacks. :redcard:

Do you have to wear high heels to work though?

---

Surely the whole point of heels is that they lift the calves and thighs and add pertness to the bottom.

Are you suggesting that this is a bad thing?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Sir C

She's got a massive wart
**** her and her flat shoes in the ear.

---

Your mum's got massive great fanny warts all overher....well....fanny. But men of sensitivity wouldn't shout about it

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Sir C

Surely the whole point of heels is that they lift the calves and thighs and add pertness to the bottom.

Are you suggesting that this is a bad thing?

---

On Rich yes

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Luis Anaconda

On Rich yes

---

But, you know, on a recptionist. I mean, we chaps have to shoulder the burdens of industry, we have to go to meetings and all sorts, and the tiny bit of recompense we get is staring at the receptionist's arse as she leads us to the meeting room... how can they take away even this small perk?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Sir C

Surely the whole point of heels is that they lift the calves and thighs and add pertness to the bottom.

Are you suggesting that this is a bad thing?

---

Oh, I'm a fan, aesthetically. And phwoaristically. I gather they do not always feel comfortable for the wearer, though, and I feel this should probably be taken into consideration.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Sir C

Surely the whole point of heels is that they lift the calves and thighs and add pertness to the bottom.

Are you suggesting that this is a bad thing?

---

I remember someone once telling me that the tie is basically an arrow pointing to the *****, so I reckon expecting me to wear one is deffo sexy jeftication :nod:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ash

Oh, I'm a fan, aesthetically. And phwoaristically. I gather they do not always feel comfortable for the wearer, though, and I feel this should probably be taken into consideration.

---

D'you think I enjoy donning this all in one latex suit with hood and feet pieces each morning? It gets damned sweaty by lunchtime, I can tell you.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Sir C

But, you know, on a recptionist. I mean, we chaps have to shoulder the burdens of industry, we have to go to meetings and all sorts, and the tiny bit of recompense we get is staring at the receptionist's arse as she leads us to the meeting room... how can they take away even this small perk?

---

:shrug: I assumed that's why we have a marketing department

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Rich

Oh, hang on - So I am not required to wear a suit to work, then? Perhaps I'll wear an MCC blazer and slacks instead.

It's quite right that an organisation would want their receptionist to appear to fit a certain image, for goodness sake.

---

Would you not be allowed to wear an MCC blazer and slacks to work?

Strikes me as reasonably tidy or whatever the requirement would be. Thankfully I work in an environment where no such rules are enforced.