This, gentleman, is an outrage. I don't care what he did with numbers, he was bang to rights, the filthy little sodomite.
This, gentleman, is an outrage. I don't care what he did with numbers, he was bang to rights, the filthy little sodomite.
All joking aside, the fact remains that he broke the law and was, therefore, a criminal.Quote:
Originally Posted by Burney
Plus, bumming.
Has any other country ever put a convicted sex offender on their banknotes?Quote:
Originally Posted by Sir C
Quote:
Originally Posted by Burney
Boris to issue a full pardon?
To be fair, I think he was pardoned a while back. Wrongly, in my opinion. The law of the day is the law. You can't just overlook that because a chap's good at maths.Quote:
Originally Posted by Alberto Balsam Rodriguez
There was a war on, you know. All hands to the pump, as it were.Quote:
Originally Posted by Burney
Not when he was caught toilet trading there wasn't. Naturally one could turn a blind eye to these things in extremis, but not in perpetuity. No, I've no sympathy. Chemical castration was too good for him.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ash
breathtaking genius is a common misconception. It was nothing more than a mechanical contraption he designed for the purpose of plunging a large wooden phallus into his bowels, leaving both hands free to tinker with his abacus.Quote:
Originally Posted by Burney
No - they just put them in the White House to stop them getting convictedQuote:
Originally Posted by Burney
Gosh.I'm happy to bow to your superior knowledge on this one, h. Given what you say, I shudder to contemplate what the 'Turing Test' of which one hears so much entails. :-( Vile bum perversions, no doubt.Quote:
Originally Posted by Herbert Augustus Chapman
Are you suggesting Washington, Jefferson, Lincoln, Jackson and Grant were sex cases, la?Quote:
Originally Posted by Luis Anaconda
Sounds like a 70s band, b :judge: guiltyQuote:
Originally Posted by Burney
If one wanted to join his team of number crunchers* one would simply be subjected, via his ungodly contraption, to a succession of phalli of increasing girth until one cried out for mercy at which point he would make his decision.Quote:
Originally Posted by Burney
*a coded reference to anyone prepared to fellate the deplorable old deviant.
:hehe: It's just missing Dave Dee (1960's I know)Quote:
Originally Posted by Luis Anaconda
If one wanted to be only slightly pedantic, one could point out that a large number of gay men restrict themselves to the use of hands and mouths and go nowhere near bums, despite their sexual orientation.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sir C
We have no proof that Turing was into bumming, I think.
All the pooves I know are mad for the bumming :shrug:Quote:
Originally Posted by WES
It is, I believe, their first port of call
Is that where Jeffrey Epstein's been these last ten years?Quote:
Originally Posted by Luis Anaconda
I always think it must be terribly wearing. :-(Quote:
Originally Posted by Sir C
In my experience the position of 'giver' and that of 'taker' seems to be assigned somehwhat counter-intuitively; that is to say, the camp one is often the 'top' and the butch one the 'bottom'. :shrug:Quote:
Originally Posted by Burney
"In my experience"?Quote:
Originally Posted by Sir C
To me, that seems even worse. At least if the roles get swapped around your respective rectii would get a bit of a rest. For one person to be taking all the punishment seems a bit rough, though. :-(Quote:
Originally Posted by Sir C
No. The more I think about it, the more I think homosexuality really isn't for me.