Given the bum's rush and arrested, apparently.
What'll they think of next :rubchin:
Printable View
Given the bum's rush and arrested, apparently.
What'll they think of next :rubchin:
The footage is most amusing. My favourite bit is the big copper trying not to laugh.Quote:
Originally Posted by redgunamo
https://twitter.com/OldBlackHack/sta...78563043409920
Proper journalist that. Not one of these corporate whores. He is what used to be called in the Soviet Union a dissident.
No. Simply vomiting out a bunch of data with no editing process, research or ethical considerations whatsoever is NOT journalism.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ash
What about the rapey* tendencies?Quote:
Originally Posted by Ash
*Allegedly.
He looks to me like he absolutely fúcking honks. Needs a good hosing down, I reckon. Dirty bástard.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sir C
Quote:
Originally Posted by redgunamo
Sentenced to a lifetime of hearing this
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9cQlVww0zKo
He's done more than that, I think.Quote:
Originally Posted by Burney
Also, you said 'bunch of data'. :hehe: Awesome.
Made up, I understand.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sir C
Sadly, we never got to find out because he decided he didn't fancy co-operating with the justice cystem.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ash
Look at his face, a, and tell me, hand on heart, that he isn't a sex offender.
:judge: Guilty.
So 'made up' that he decided seven years hiding in a broom cupboard was preferable to seeing them properly scrutinised (and presumably therefore dismissed) in probably the most insanely liberal justice system on the planet.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ash
Righto.
A new guvmint in Ecuador wanted an IMF loan and the US made it conditional on this. It's been a while since I read what some of the Trump cultists were saying, but they loved JA and reckoned DJT would spring him and pardon him. Whether they will be disappointed or pleased, we shall see.Quote:
Originally Posted by redgunamo
Hopefully for his sake...Ramsey restricts himself to poncey side passes and assists tonight.
Not sure what you mean by "insanely liberal" but we do live an era where all claims made by women against men are assumed to be true. Anyway, it's the publication of state secrets that he's really in trouble for imo.Quote:
Originally Posted by Burney
More importantly....what’s this all about:
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-47892812
Sex game gone wrong...novices!
Swedish courts are infamous for letting off rapists for 'cultural' reasons. Granted old Jules is the wrong religion/colour for that, but even so.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ash
Well he's just been further arrested on a US extradition warrant, so....Quote:
Originally Posted by Ash
Ooh really? They might fry him, those crazy Yanquis.Quote:
Originally Posted by Burney
:hehe:
'Sex game gone wrong' is very much to the murder of a girlfriend what 'she walked into a door' is to wifebeating.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tony C
:hehe: That would be amusing, but being massive pussies, we'll probably insist no extradition can take place without a guarantee they won't top him. :-(Quote:
Originally Posted by Sir C
That's an EU law though, and since we're no longer, hold on, wait... :homer:Quote:
Originally Posted by Burney
I wish they'd topped that other one. You know, the one who turned into a girl.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sir C
Chelseas Snowden, is it? To be honest all this American whistle-blowing nonsense passes me by. Do they not have Scalphunters toi deal with these troublesome creatures?Quote:
Originally Posted by Burney
Fawn would've made short work of them. I always wanted more of Fawn. He struck me as a top-quality psychopath. Is it The Honourable Schoolboy where he calmly breaks some chap's arms? :hehe:Quote:
Originally Posted by Sir C
Another thought strikes me: how good a party will they be having in the Ecuadorian embassy tonight now they've got rid of the smelly weirdo? Might pop along there with a bottle.
Ooh I'm going to give THS a listen again, I think.Quote:
Originally Posted by Burney
Liberal from whose point of view? When I looked into this some years ago I seem to recall that Sweden had something like 5 levels of 'rape' and the least significant was something like 'I agreed to sleep with him but subsequently regretted it' yet it could still be punished with a custodial sentence. Feminists might consider that very liberal; many men would disagree.Quote:
Originally Posted by Burney
Also, he isn't afraid of being convicted of rape, he's afraid of being extradited to the US of A to be charged with the leaky thing after being extradited to Sweden for the rape charge.
And all of this could have been avoided had the Swedish authorities simply agreed to interview him in the UK instead of him having to travel to Sweden. Given how minor the charge is, I would also be suspicious if I was him that they refused to do so.
Blimey. I realise that women aren't really your thing, but, you know, I'm not sure anyone should really be describing rape as a minor matter.Quote:
Originally Posted by WES
I believe that the specific charge in this case is that sex was conditional on him using a condom, but that, when it came to it, he popped it in unsheathed.Quote:
Originally Posted by WES
At best that is extremely poor sexual etiquette and definitely more than a little bit rapey.
Which is what this is about, not the sex charge which I think was dropped.Quote:
Originally Posted by Burney
"Wikileaks. I love Wikileaks." - Donald Trump, October 2016
We'll see who really is in charge of the USA. I suspect it is not the president. Assange will probably die, while Islamists in the UK are not extradited to middle east countries where they are wanted for crimes because ... they might die.
To be fair, any bástard daft enough to publish US government secrets whilst expecting not to die as a result clearly needs to be removed from the gene pool.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ash
The only mystery is why they haven't just sorted him out quietly and without a fuss. It would appear that the CIA lacks the joyous pragmatism of, say, MI6 or Mossad.
:hehe: :hehe:Quote:
Originally Posted by Burney
It's been a few years but my recollection is that woman A voluntarily slept with him at a conference and the next day woman B also voluntarily slept with him. About a week later woman A and B were having lunch and discovered that they had both slept with him and they exchanged notes, as such. There was something similar that they both disliked (possibly the condom thing) and they then agreed that he should be charged with rape, a charge that never would have been made in a less 'liberal' society.Quote:
Originally Posted by Burney
A retired detective in Sweden reviewed the case and said it was the weakest he had ever seen and there was virtually no chance of it proceeding to trial. Despite this, the Swedes still insist he come to Sweden for an interview, an interview he agreed to hold in the UK but not in Sweden due to fear of extradition.
I can understand his paranoia, especially as he appears to be a bit of a nutter.
Swift justice, already got 12 months for breaching his bail terms :hehe:Quote:
Originally Posted by redgunamo
He’s a proper nasty piece of work, by all accounts.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ash
“When the Guardian editors told him they would redact the names of Afghans mentioned in the cables whose lives would be otherwise endangered, Assange said: “Well, they're informants. So, if they get killed, they've got it coming to them. They deserve it.” https://t.co/9OWzYWFV0H”
Like I said. Not a journalist.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sir C
Also smeared faeces on the wall of the Ecuadorian Embassy, the dirty get.
A very literal smear.
looooool. Avenatti too, now.
At least that means everyone gets to see more of Ms. Daniels :-\
https://saraacarter.com/thursday-ind...ulian-assange/
Quote:
Originally Posted by PSRB
To be fair, nobody likes a grass. Not really.
Unless perhaps .. :rubchin: " ..the arrest of WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange could uncover details of a Ukrainian plot against Trump and Russia." #LockHerUp
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sir C
and "Giuliani told the Examiner he thinks Assange might have information that would "show who invented [the] false story that [Trump] colluded with Russians."Quote:
Originally Posted by redgunamo
Crowdstrike invented it, surely everyone knows that who has their eyes open. With their connections to Ukrainian oligarchs, anti-Russian think tanks and, oh, Hillary Clinton! Only they investigated the DNC server, and curiously not the FBI, or Muellers investigation or anyone else.
Meanwhile, Craig Murray and Julian Assange, the two people who claim to know who actually provided Wikileaks with the data (leaked, not hacked), were never consulted by the FIBs or the investigation.
Naturally, because the last thing M & Co. want is young Julian testifying under oath that his source was in fact "that dead guy", for instance, rather than the Commies. The Feeb's (and Mueller's) conclusions regarding the so-called hack only make sense so long they are never, ever tested in front of any half-decent defence lawyer.
Assange could write a book about it, I suppose, as he's unlikely to ever get his day in court :-\
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ash
Right. Now that the witch-hunt is over, they don't really need him anymore. But, if he could finger Hillary, so to speak, that would be a story they might like to reach a wider audience ..
The big question is: What was Mueller really investigating. After all, he would've known 100% that POTUS45-elect was innocent on day one; all the intelligence and evidence would've been waiting for him in his inbox. Curious.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ash