Well done to the Biriths state for upholding its right to kill innocent individuals

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Burney

... because they know a fúck sight better than we do.

---

except Rich. of course.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by IUFG

except Rich. of course.

---

God, yes! I wouldn't trust r to diagnose a missing leg.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Burney

God, yes! I wouldn't trust r to diagnose a missing leg.

---

I'm still bitter about his failure to diagnose my shoulder issues at the beginning, when treatment would have been simple and guaranteed to work.

It's like he wants me to be permanently disabled.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Sir C

I'm still bitter about his failure to diagnose my shoulder issues at the beginning, when treatment would have been simple and guaranteed to work.

It's like he wants me to be permanently disabled.

---

You should sue him. I'm sure he's probably liable somehow.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Peter

I heard that the Doctor in the states hadn't examined the child.

Could someone not have organised for the bloke to pop over and have a quick look? Might have been a bloody start.

With respect, you don't know whether any treatments had a chance of success or not. You are going on the opinion of the british doctors.

---

Isn't the key question: Who is to pay for all this.

I don't know, was it the NHS?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by redgunamo

Isn't the key question: Who is to pay for all this.

I don't know, was it the NHS?

---

At one point, the Donald was offering to do so. The issue wasn't money, but patient welfare.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Burney

At one point, the Donald was offering to do so. The issue wasn't money, but patient welfare.

---

Why couldn't the Doctor come to the kid and at least have a look?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Burney

At one point, the Donald was offering to do so. The issue wasn't money, but patient welfare.

---

Alright. But was it an NHS-thing? Naturally they'd have different priorities than the Donald, wouldn't they.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Peter

Why couldn't the Doctor come to the kid and at least have a look?

---

The court put him on the spot last week and asked him if he'd be willing to come over and make an assessment. He was rather taken aback, but reluctantly agreed to. However, before he did, the latest scans showed the child's situation to be hopeless.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by redgunamo

Alright. But was it an NHS-thing? Naturally they'd have different priorities than the Donald, wouldn't they.

---

Only in the sense that the NHS are the ones responsible for the child's care and welfare.