I was wondering about the legal position regarding the revocation of

Miss Belgium's UK citizenship; luckily, the British Nationality Act of 1981 is as clear as clear can be:

BNA 1981 Section 40 part 2:

The Secretary of State may by order deprive a person of a citizenship status if the Secretary of State is satisfied that deprivation is conducive to the public good.

BNA 1981 Section 40 part 3:

Subject to the provisions of this section, the Secretary of State may by order deprive any British citizen to whom this subsection applies of his British citizenship if the Secretary of State is satisfied that that citizen -

(a) has shown himself by act or speech to be disloyal or disaffected towards Her Majesty; or

(b) has, during any war in which Her Majesty was engaged, unlawfully traded or communicated with an enemy or been engaged in or associated with any business that was to his knowledge carried on in such a manner as to assist an enemy in that war;

So there we go, we can all move along, there is nothing more to se here.

wd sajid javid.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Sir C

(a) has shown himself by act or speech to be disloyal or disaffected towards Her Majesty; or

(b) has, during any war in which Her Majesty was engaged, unlawfully traded or communicated with an enemy or been engaged in or associated with any business that was to his knowledge carried on in such a manner as to assist an enemy in that war;
.

---

That's the first thing he SJWs will try to posit; that the law only applies to men. This should get the transers in a flux anyways.

I should imagine that by the end of the day the bellowing indignation of the ISIS apologists will be reaching a crescendo. I just know this decision will be overturned ( and so do you c :-( )

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Sir C

Miss Belgium's UK citizenship; luckily, the British Nationality Act of 1981 is as clear as clear can be:

BNA 1981 Section 40 part 2:

The Secretary of State may by order deprive a person of a citizenship status if the Secretary of State is satisfied that deprivation is conducive to the public good.

BNA 1981 Section 40 part 3:

Subject to the provisions of this section, the Secretary of State may by order deprive any British citizen to whom this subsection applies of his British citizenship if the Secretary of State is satisfied that that citizen -

(a) has shown himself by act or speech to be disloyal or disaffected towards Her Majesty; or

(b) has, during any war in which Her Majesty was engaged, unlawfully traded or communicated with an enemy or been engaged in or associated with any business that was to his knowledge carried on in such a manner as to assist an enemy in that war;

So there we go, we can all move along, there is nothing more to se here.

wd sajid javid.

---

What about the babby?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Luis Anaconda

What about the babby?

---

What about the baby? It remains a British citizen, obviously :shrug:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Monty92

What about the baby? It remains a British citizen, obviously :shrug:

---

Or a Dutch one.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Burney

Or a Dutch one.

---

Yes but that would be his parents' decision, rather than the UK Government's.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Sir C

Miss Belgium's UK citizenship; luckily, the British Nationality Act of 1981 is as clear as clear can be:

BNA 1981 Section 40 part 2:

The Secretary of State may by order deprive a person of a citizenship status if the Secretary of State is satisfied that deprivation is conducive to the public good.

BNA 1981 Section 40 part 3:

Subject to the provisions of this section, the Secretary of State may by order deprive any British citizen to whom this subsection applies of his British citizenship if the Secretary of State is satisfied that that citizen -

(a) has shown himself by act or speech to be disloyal or disaffected towards Her Majesty; or

(b) has, during any war in which Her Majesty was engaged, unlawfully traded or communicated with an enemy or been engaged in or associated with any business that was to his knowledge carried on in such a manner as to assist an enemy in that war;

So there we go, we can all move along, there is nothing more to se here.

wd sajid javid.

---

My strong feeling is that it'll get overturned by m'learned friends, but that Javid realised that, were she allowed back, there would have been no chance of her receiving anything more than a talking-to. So, rather than be shown to be impotent in the face of our supine courts, police and social care monkeys, he chose to do the one thing that he could that made him look strong - even though he knows that later on, he'll probably have to shrug and blame the courts.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Monty92

Yes but that would be his parents' decision, rather than the UK Government's.

---

Not really sure why they should get any say at all, tbh. Besides, as I understand it, Dutch law is much more paternalistic in these matters and regards the child of a Dutch father as automatically being a Dutch.

Even so, I can't imagine they'll be clamouring to get the spawn of two fùcking jihadis on their books any time soon.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Monty92

What about the baby? It remains a British citizen, obviously :shrug:

---

Ah - I missed the bit where the baby was born. I was wondering if someone is stripped of citizenship while pregnant what would the status of the baby be. But then again I don't really care

It is pretty odd that parents routinely have their kids taken away from them for negligent behaviour such as alcoholism, smacking their kids around a bit. And yet a woman with avowed sadistic motivations is allowed to keep hers.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Burney

Not really sure why they should get any say at all, tbh. Besides, as I understand it, Dutch law is much more paternalistic in these matters and regards the child of a Dutch father as automatically being a Dutch.

Even so, I can't imagine they'll be clamouring to get the spawn of two fùcking jihadis on their books any time soon.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Burney

Not really sure why they should get any say at all, tbh. Besides, as I understand it, Dutch law is much more paternalistic in these matters and regards the child of a Dutch father as automatically being a Dutch.

Even so, I can't imagine they'll be clamouring to get the spawn of two fùcking jihadis on their books any time soon.

---

Oh Mijneer Rutte will be positively falling over himself to demonstrate the essential Dutch qualities of, you know, being leftards.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Monty92

It is pretty odd that parents routinely have their kids taken away from them for negligent behaviour such as alcoholism, smacking their kids around a bit. And yet a woman with avowed sadistic motivations is allowed to keep hers.

---

I think we've probably established by now that there is virtually no principle of social care, jurisprudence or policing that we are not prepared to ride roughshod over if it involves Allans.

In fact, the reason this decision is causing such a stir is that for once we haven't just rolled over.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Sir C

Oh Mijneer Rutte will be positively falling over himself to demonstrate the essential Dutch qualities of, you know, being leftards.

---

He's pretty fùcking mouthy for a bloke who's only in the job because of an anti-Wilders protest vote, isn't he?

Speccy cùnt.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Burney

He's pretty fùcking mouthy for a bloke who's only in the job because of an anti-Wilders protest vote, isn't he?

Speccy cùnt.

---

I hated him from the moment I heard him being interviewed on Radio 4, when John Humphrys called him, 'Prime Minister' and he replied, without a hint of self-awareness of the patronising nature of his response, 'That's not how we do things in the Netherlands, please call me Marc.'

****.

Someone needs to tell her that since she’s been away we now have Universal credits...that should scare her off imo

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Sir C

I hated him from the moment I heard him being interviewed on Radio 4, when John Humphrys called him, 'Prime Minister' and he replied, without a hint of self-awareness of the patronising nature of his response, 'That's not how we do things in the Netherlands, please call me Marc.'

****.

---

:nod: Plus he hasn't got great hair like Geert Wilders. :love:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Burney

:nod: Plus he hasn't got great hair like Geert Wilders. :love:

---

The Dutch Prime Minister has an official residence just outside The Hague.

Here it is:

Attachment 1053

Nice enough gaffe, surely?

Our man Mark lives in a small flat in the centre of The Hague 'to be nearer his office'.

****.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Sir C

The Dutch Prime Minister has an official residence just outside The Hague.

Here it is:

Attachment 1053

Nice enough gaffe, surely?

Our man Mark lives in a small flat in the centre of The Hague 'to be nearer his office'.

****.

---

Ugh. Virtue-signalling prick. What does he do when foreign potentates rock up? Invite them in for a Pot Noodle?

Mind you, this is what happens when your Royal Family abandons gravitas in favour of the common touch. No-one knows how to behave.