http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/42542576
:clap:
Quite right that we shouldn't let that horrible little c*nt Dean get away with this too easily.
Printable View
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/42542576
:clap:
Quite right that we shouldn't let that horrible little c*nt Dean get away with this too easily.
Talksport doing their usual stirring for clicks
talkSPORTDrive Retweeted
Alan Biggs
Verified account @AlanBiggs1
7m7 minutes ago
Alan Biggs Retweeted talkSPORT
His public comments were dangerous as well. Even if the decision he complained about was wrong. The fact is managers cant say a referee has seen what he wants to see. The implications are too serious. Not to say unjustified and unfair.
I have only seen/read Winter almost openly question a referee like that twice with regard to Arsenal.
Yesterday with Dean, and Mike Riley after the 50th game at OT when he referred to him as (I paraphrase) 'an honest referee in wretched form'.
Which effectively meant 'cheat'.
Yes - he's still a ****. I was almost tempted to comment on this particular gem yesterday:
"Guardiola is right. Some contact, clearly, has to be allowed but “there are limits”, as he says. Anything that endangers a player needs proper sanction from the referee. English football spent most of the second half of 2017 watching City in awe but insufficient time actually listening to Guardiola. A timely new year’s resolution for English football is for Guardiola’s plea to be heeded."
Imagine if another manager had been saying this for years and been ignored/ridiculed for being a soft French manager
not withstanding Mark Clattenburg admitting he did not apply the rules/laws of the game in the Chelsea - Spurs match (when Spurs season nearly did its final lap in the clown's car) :rolleyes:
I haven't read or heard of a single journo / pundit who thinks it was a pelanty and Dean was correct.
I've never really been one for knowing one football 'journalist' from another, to be honest, feeling that writing about games isn't really Hunter Thompson territory, but one I have noticed recently is this Duncan Castles fellow. He appears to be some sort of Mourinho mouthpiece. Can this be some sort of financial arrangement, with the Portuguese knobhead paying for Castles to blwo sunshine up his arse?
Credit to that rat faced, Reyes kicking, little weasel Neville for his contemptuous description of the 'penalty'.
If only the Sky cretins in October 2004 had had the courage to describe what was actually happening on the pitch with Riley that day.
Not that I'm still bitter about it, of course. :-(
Bitter? I still seethe about that reffing...
Riley? :cry:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mM747L9Wf8M
painful, but every time you watch it you find more evidence that Riley was on their ****ing payroll...
Undoubtedly, particularly the Manchester-based ones some of whom were Utd fans (though bearing in mind he once refused to talk to his own club's , and he was there an awfully long time. Castles is a Scottish based writer who had no real connection with Utd before Mourinho came in.
It's referees in general. Look at them. They're the sort of narcissistic sneaks who were despised at school and never had girlfriends, but nonetheless retained a mystifying sense of their own superiority. Thus, as adults they seek out positions of public authority where they can lord it over others while cravenly siding with where they perceive the power to lie.
Basically, they're all power-mad sexual and social inadequates and I have very little doubt that many of them are charlie chesters.
Yes - as we well know, "fans" (or ex-players) can be the harshest critics, while those with no connections to the club can be the biggest cheerleaders. Dear old Dorset would never accept that Daniel Taylor wasn't a United fan, merely someone whose job relied on covering the club, despite me proving to him that Taylor was a Forest supporter from Nottingham who had written books on being a Nottingham Forest fan
It's the same syndrome, but crucially, football refereeing (at the top level in particular) gives them a huge stage upon which to display their inordinate egotistical cüntery. This is crucial. You have to bear in mind that, when you're booing a referee, he's almost certainly getting sexual pleasure from it and has as huge an erection as his shrivelled and useless manhood will allow.
are you suggesting that the man in the middle of this photo has a tiny todger, b?
http://cdn.playbuzz.com/cdn/8e3c33d9...10efae7167.jpg
:nod: and now the proliferation of them with TV spots or with their own newspaper columns (Foy, Webb, Gallagher, Poll, Halsey, Clattenburg - did I miss anyone) is showing them up to be the attention seeking pricks we all knew them to be. Which makes the lack of access after a game to the ones actually still going even more of a farce.
Speaking of attention seekers - who can forget this ****
http://www.jeffwinterentertainmentandmedia.co.uk
My parents gave me some of my old school reports over Christmas and you can see the same syndrome there. Some of the ****ers just put in a nasty comment for the sake of getting you in trouble. 'Peter is able at French but unfortunately he is also lazy and disruptive with a poor attitude'. ****ers.
Best of all was 'Peter is not a brilliant mathematician...'- with respect mate, neither are you- you are a gym teacher who does a bit of second year maths on the side. I wouldn't trust you to score a game of darts.
The words lazy, indisciplined, indifferent, disruptive, antagonistic made a lot of appearances..... lazy and indisciplined are fine but the others are just not true. ****ers.
Poll was the first to take this route, of course.
God, I hated Graham Poll. I remember that game against Newcastle when that senile old prick Bobby Robson decided to give us a lecture on sportsmanship for daring to complain after that preening cünt had given his team the game.
Any vestige of liking I may ever have had for Bobby Robson disappeared that night.
I saw one of my old primary school reports a couple of years ago. My headmaster said 'It is clear that Burney is not destined to be one of the hewers of wood and drawers of water...'.
In other words 'Most of the pond life I'm forced to teach will end up dead by 30, on the dole and/or in prison. This one might actually get a half-decent job if the other feral cünts don't kill him first. Well done.'. :hehe: He'd probably get sacked for a comment like that these days.
Mind you, the school was in Thornton Heath, so you can see his point.
See, that is nice. Mine were all basically'Peter is a bit of a **** and not as clever as he thinks he is'. This is totally unfair. I was a pretty quiet kid, nowhere near as much of a **** as those around me and I certainly didn't think I was clever.
My old history teacher stuck it to me in every report, regardless of results. Lazy, no effort, doesnt listen to criticism. Not true, he just didnt like me because he hated my sister. What a ****.
My poor parents, having to read those reports and go to parents evenings :) I am surprised they still speak to me.....
Exactly the same has to be said of another total ****- Durkin. When we won the league there 1-0 he booked four united players in the first half hour and they had no choice but to back off. This is exactly how you refereee a game where one team has a clear plan to hack away at the other. THey all know they can only keep doing it until they are booked.
A ref who cant spot what is going on shouldn't be on the pitch.