How much would one have to pay one's GP to get diagnosed with

autism and impaired cognition? :rubchin:

https://www.theguardian.com/society/...ex-court-rules

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Monty92

autism and impaired cognition? :rubchin:

https://www.theguardian.com/society/...ex-court-rules

---

I can't help but feel that to say people have a 'fundamental right to sex' represents something of a can of worms.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Burney

I can't help but feel that to say people have a 'fundamental right to sex' represents something of a can of worms.

---

A fundamental right to "pursue" sex, no? That's a very different thing to a fundamental right to sex.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Monty92

A fundamental right to "pursue" sex, no? That's a very different thing to a fundamental right to sex.

---

No. That's what the headline says, but the actual quote from the judge refers to "a fundamental right to sex", which strikes me as carte blanche for Johnny Rapist.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Monty92

A fundamental right to "pursue" sex, no? That's a very different thing to a fundamental right to sex.

---

You've just conjured the end sequence on a episode of the Benny Hill Show. (Ask an adult).

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Monty92

autism and impaired cognition? :rubchin:

https://www.theguardian.com/society/...ex-court-rules

---

Ah, to stop the person being sent to a low or medium secure hospital because of his 'offending behaviour', no doubt.

He only touches women (or men) up because he's autistic. And has a fundamental right to sex. Obviously a greater fundamental right than that of a woman (or man) not to be molested by a mentalist.

Lawyers and judges should be embarassed to take their salaries and fees for supporting this sort of nonsense.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Sir C

You've just conjured the end sequence on a episode of the Benny Hill Show. (Ask an adult).

---

:yaketysax:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by IUFG

Ah, to stop the person being sent to a low or medium secure hospital because of his 'offending behaviour', no doubt.

He only touches women (or men) up because he's autistic. And has a fundamental right to sex. Obviously a greater fundamental right than that of a woman (or man) not to be molested by a mentalist.

Lawyers and judges should be embarassed to take their salaries and fees for supporting this sort of nonsense.

---

I don't think they're called mentalists any more, i.

The PC term is 'loonies'.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Burney

No. That's what the headline says, but the actual quote from the judge refers to "a fundamental right to sex", which strikes me as carte blanche for Johnny Rapist.

---

But this fella has never actually been charged with any criminal offence. Are you really arguing that we should be restricting freedoms on socially awkward but law abiding people?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Monty92

But this fella has never actually been charged with any criminal offence. Are you really arguing that we should be restricting freedoms on socially awkward but law abiding people?

---

How was your tasting menu?