Couldn't happen to a nicer bunch of lads, imo.
If it *does* happen that is, of course.
Which it obviously won't :-(
Printable View
Couldn't happen to a nicer bunch of lads, imo.
If it *does* happen that is, of course.
Which it obviously won't :-(
Out of what Red?Quote:
Originally Posted by redgunamo
Some how Tottenham are above us now. how did this happen Red?Quote:
Originally Posted by redgunamo
I don't know really. This season's race for glory?Quote:
Originally Posted by SWv2
The title race, as such??Quote:
Originally Posted by redgunamo
Not sure they have ever really been in it have they.
Top Three/Four is glorious too. What about that?Quote:
Originally Posted by SWv2
they're are the better team, f. Get with the programme. etc
Their fans are reaching the deluded level of scousers now - it's quite hilarious how some are buying into Mourinho's, they're out to get me. One on the comments section suggested that if the Niasse tackle had been perpetrated by Rooney, he would have been sent off.Quote:
Originally Posted by redgunamo
Yes that Rooney
Spurs are a very good team F. To deny so is silly.Quote:
Originally Posted by Pat Vegas
Are we a very good team too?Quote:
Originally Posted by SWv2
No we are **** Monty.Quote:
Originally Posted by Monty92
It has been established last season that a great season for spurs is a terrible one for Arsenal.
I don't have the same dislike of them as I have had in the past. they are doing a good job.Quote:
Originally Posted by SWv2
Liverpool I also do not have the same dislike for them as I used to since the whole Gerrard era has gone. actually same goes for Chelsea though I do not like Costa.
It's definitely strange times when the far more interesting question around here is "How does everyone feel about the Arsenal", :-\Quote:
Originally Posted by Pat Vegas
Yes. To deny so is equally as silly.Quote:
Originally Posted by Monty92
We (some) dismiss Spurs because they are Spurs, no other reason. They have an excellent goalkeeper, a defence probably as good as any in the league, a formidable midfield and a functioning attack.
We are superior to them in terms of numbers / back up though of course some will question the quality of our numeric advantage. We are also superior to them in terms of the stardust provided by our two genuine top level players. They do not have any players of this level in my view.
Football however is of course a team game, quite a complex game but at the same time quite a simple game. Stardust alone is not enough.
p.s. well done. I know I can always rely on you for an utterly retarded and indeed spasticated comment and you have provided it here. You utter fúcking moron.
It might be worth asking admin if they can automate your replies to me to include that last sentence as a special signature.Quote:
Originally Posted by SWv2
Well I apologise if it sounds a little harsh but really - "Are we a very good team too?".Quote:
Originally Posted by Monty92
Jesus fúcking christ, are you 9 years old?
I am unsure if anybody has ever claimed otherwise.
It is the common held knowledge and acceptance of the quality we have, and then the huge resources and infrastructure to back that up, which causes people to think we regularly underperform and that we will continue to do so year on year.
That feeling is simply heightened in the immediate aftermath of a Watford debacle.
Win on Saturday and in the eyes of some the title is back on.
That's a good question. I will turn it into a thread.Quote:
Originally Posted by redgunamo
Save it until May, imo.Quote:
Originally Posted by Pat Vegas
At the current moment we are not a very good team in the first half of matches. (Southampton match excluded).Quote:
Originally Posted by Monty92