pathetic sights on this earth than an angry liberal :hehe:
pathetic sights on this earth than an angry liberal :hehe:
Absolute f@cking state of this one :hehe:
https://twitter.com/Crisprtek/status/796597718751838208
Right. Especially as it was their own failings, flaws and foibles what won it, not Trump's.
You are missing the point, somewhat. If Corbyn was elected and people reacted by weeping hysterically (or claiming to), they would be just as mockable as the angry lefties in question. :shrug:
One expects a little dignity from one's fellow citizens, as well as, perhaps, a touch of respect for the democratic process.
If I believed that was a possibility, I would probably take a look at the reasons why it might happen rather than arrogantly and lazily dismissing those who made the choice as stupid/insane/racist/whatever. Your lofty assumption that the status quo that happens to suit you is sanity and all else is insanity is precisely the mindset that meant Clinton and her ilk didn't see this coming.
""Thought bubble: "I'm gonna be getting me some serious leftie pussy if this makes the news""
Are you telling us that if Corbyn got elected you would look at it rationally and objectively and not demonstrate any emotion at all? Really? I'm dubious, Burney. :-)
And I never said that anything other than the status quo was insane, I glibly suggested that voting for Trump was. That's rather different.
Well you're wrong, I'm afraid. I don't have to agree with something to understand or empathise with it or be rational about it. The reason I find Corbyn so hilarious is that he is so demonstrably the diametrically wrong answer to the problems currently facing the British political left. Equally, I find some of his policies and utterances ridiculous and even offensive. Nonetheless, I can still understand that he appeals to a vestigial purist leftism that never felt enturely comfortable with the compromises required to achieve electoral success under Blair and that (in addition to Labour's rock-bottom morale post the 2015 general election) is what got him elected. There you go: rational, objective analysis of something I don't agree with whatsoever.
In this election, Trump was the only meaningful alternative to the status quo that was available. Given which, there was nothing insane about voting for him.
This is the left for you...if the shoe was on the other foot we would accept the results and move forward but the social justice and feminist mob are an incredibly merciless and hateful bunch.
I say us...because we pretty much saw the same reactions from the pro Euro voters post Brexit...in a more tasteful British way rather than the crass US version
By the way...seems to be mostly you white people protesting...
Trump is not my president....my advice to Supreme Leader Donald...flag them all for deportation :nod:
Attachment 363
ddddfdfdfdfdd
I must confess that I have heard him say nothing first hand, since I find his voice and face so repulsive that i avoid any direct view of him, so my information on his utterances is gleaned from the media and social media.
I probably don't have a very balanced view, do I? :-(
Oh he's clearly a truly appalling human who believes in nothing and understands almost as little. But in a sense I think this makes him ideologically neutral in that he approaches issues with no preconceptions.
So when he sees Allans murdering innocent people on the streets of America and Europe, he delivers an instinctive, rational reaction rather than one skewed by his existing beliefs or hobby horses. And the instinctive rational reaction to islamic terrorism is to stop the cu*nts coming to your country, even if that inconveniences/offends millions of innocent Allans.
I doubt very much he's a racist, although he does seem to played a little fast and loose with notions of sexual consent.
You're totally wrong. There are no checks and balances. It's tribal. The republicans control all three branches, and now the "lefties," in order to have any chance at regaining power, are going to have to go on a rampage. I believe that the "right," to counter this, will set up paramilitary organizations in defense of those three branches. Things are going to devolve try quickly into bloodshed, government inaction, and finally civil war.
Meanwhile awimb will continue as ever, one hopes. :-)
Eh? So your choice loses an election and so you "have to" go on a rampage? What's wrong with waiting till the next election and winning that? Y'know, by perhaps picking a better candidate?
Anyway, the Republican establishment hate Trump as much as the Democrat establishment, don't they? So probably he doesn't actually control the houses at all.
Voting for Trump may well be insane, but on foreign policy, voting for Clinton is batshít crazy. More Iraqs. More Libyas. More Syrias. Perhaps next time against Russia. The Clinton Foundation enjoys massive donations from Saudi Arabia. Saudi fůcking Arabia, the epicentre of Islamist terrorism. She wants to aid Al Quaeda and ISIS in Syria by threatening war with Russia if it continue to support government forces. While Trump seeks to thaw relations with Russia and end US support for Saudi Arabia.
Trump well be some or all of the awful things he appears to be, but one of the things he does not appear to be is a member of the neocon/libhawk Washington endless war machine, with its madness of claiming to fight terrorism on one hand, while using the same terrorists as a regime-changing attack dog on the other while plunging countries into endless chaos.
And the funny thing is, the people who consider themselves so superior in intellect and knowledge to Trump's voters just don't seem to understand any of this. Like the posh young lady in the pub last night who was explaining to me that the reason people voted for Trump was because they were all morons who identified with him because he was a moron. Five minutes later she admitted to not having a clue where Angola was or even that there was a country of that name.
This is rather good, a
https://medium.com/@dizzy_thinks/con...cc1#.vwv3rc2kz
He makes an interesting point about Leave being an identity-politics backlash, but I like to be optimistic that it was more of a positive expression of democratic than that. He's obviously spot on about the irony of people shouting "fascist" while seeking to reduce suffrage to only those with the correct opinions.
Excellent post sir. Anyone who could even consider voting for Clinton if they knew ANYTHING about what has been going on with her band of corruptables, the Foundation, her dreadful foreign policy and her immigration plans is beyond contempt. That's the thing though, these mainstream media brainwashed idiots don't know any of this.
I haven't said anything about the intellect of Trump's voters. I judge Trump based on his actions and the things he has said. And using that as a barometer he is an intellectually superficial, mysoginistic, racist moron. And the idea that someone should vote for such an idiot because the alternative was 'status quo' strikes me as absurd.
And the only thing I've ever heard Trump say about Islamic extremism is that he will ban all Muslims (presumably some of whom believe in a secular democracy) from entering the US of A and that he wants to 'take out' ISIS. Not sure how Ash came to his conclusions re Trump's foreign policy given how little he's actually said about it.