For the martinelli goal?
Printable View
For the martinelli goal?
Definitely - and for the red card. Was it just me or should Leno have wiped Abraham out. Red card and a free better than red card and penaltyQuote:
Originally Posted by Pat Vegas
Thought Luiz was daft, had got back and Abrahams was going to struggle to get a meaningful shot away.Quote:
Originally Posted by Luis Anaconda
Is the alternative that Luiz attempts to block the shot without committing a foul and a red card? 1-0 down with 70 minutes left and 11 v 11 doesn’t seem that bad to meQuote:
Originally Posted by Luis Anaconda
Never get sent off within the first 70 mins. That's what one of my old managers used to us.Quote:
Originally Posted by Luis Anaconda
Everything was (un)fair game after that, I assumed.
yes - that would have been preferable. Just seem Leno - and I like him - seemed a bit passive. Lehmann and Seaman would have taken a more physical approachQuote:
Originally Posted by WES
yeah Lehmann certainly proved that in a little match back in '06 :-(Quote:
Originally Posted by Luis Anaconda
I was thinking let him take a shot he might have missed.Quote:
Originally Posted by Luis Anaconda
Though in a weird way if they had scored and 11v11 perhaps we would have lost. 10 men made us play defensively
Ref STILL should have let play go for another second!!! :furious:Quote:
Originally Posted by barrybueno
Wise words from the manager (although pretty obvious you'd hope) However Shítshow is one rash thick muthafúcka to do that halfway through the first half.Quote:
Originally Posted by IUFG
Oh I agree totally with that, they'd definitely let that roll on a few seconds these days.Quote:
Originally Posted by PSRB
Luiz warmed Tammy up for when Holding had that sly push into the hoardings...he was f**ked after that
Arteta is teaching them the dark arts.
Even Gwen got into the fun...didn’t bother trying to fake it...kicked the guy, stoped the attack, took his yellow.
Apparently (and I'm asking you as you know these things and I don't) if Luiz had actually tried to win the ball, even if it's 99% certain he can't and will commit a foul, then as it's a penalty, it's not a red card. {They didn't say but I'd guess a yellow.}Quote:
Originally Posted by Luis Anaconda
It's only if you do a deliberate foul. Like Luiz pushing him over.
So if he'd just slid down on the goal side and the Chav had tripped over his leg, it would have been a genuine tackle attempt and no red.
Also, Mustafi was getting back. Almost certain goal, I admit, but the same as a penalty.
In short, all 3 of them fücked up to varying degrees.
+VEs were Martinelli and Hector being back. If Hector can teach Pépé how to play with him, we'll have a real threat down that side. Also Saka and Martinelli look like they'll learn to link up. {Hector was a winger in his yoof, too.)
So if they can learn how to then play triangles with Ozil, he can overload one of the sides like Cashley, Bobby and Titi.
If only we had Santi (or TR7) in the Xhaka role. A pwoppa box-to-box MF who doesn't just stand by and watch opponents run past him, wgo can also shield the defence, but has the skill to play Wengaball with Ozil.
Should only have been a yellow if he tries to win the ball yes. Though I suspect with the goalkeeper out of the equation ref may still have shown redQuote:
Originally Posted by Ganpati's Goonerz--AFC's Aboriginal Fertility Cult
I thought the rules were changed a few years ago to prevent the 'double whammy' of conceding a penalty and having a man sent off for one foul.Quote:
Originally Posted by Luis Anaconda
well if you read the comments above it explains it all, if it is a deliberate fould to stop a goal scoring opp' then it is still a red card, if it is an attempt to play the ball then it isn'tQuote:
Originally Posted by Rich
They were, hence you will rarely see a keeper sent off for conceding a pen these days - the caveat being that if the defender isn't deemed to make an attempt to play the ball (ie a shirt pull or a blatant push) it can still be a red card. Think Luiz's fell into that categoryQuote:
Originally Posted by Rich
(also before Berni see this, you should change rules to Laws)
On more important matters - recall for Archer tomorrow? Or leave the winning team intact. Not sure South Africa have much in the tank to be honest - particularly without Rabada, but knowing England they could **** it up
:nod:Quote:
Originally Posted by Luis Anaconda
DENYING A GOAL OR AN OBVIOUS GOAL-SCORING OPPORTUNITY
Where a player commits an offence against an opponent within their own penalty area which denies an opponent an obvious goal-scoring opportunity and the referee awards a penalty kick, the offending player is cautioned if the offence was an attempt to play the ball; in all other circumstances (e.g. holding, pulling, pushing, no possibility to play the ball etc.) the offending player must be sent off.