My oldest friend became engaged to his woman in 2013. Last year we received an invite

Printable View

11-26-2018, 02:09 PM
Burney

My oldest friend became engaged to his woman in 2013. Last year we received an invite

(well, a save the date) to their marriage in July 2019.
This morning I received a card saying it was postponed until 2021. :hehe:
This is the same man who had a vasectomy on a 9-month work secondment to Sydney and has still never told her.

It’s never, ever happening, is it? :hehe:
11-26-2018, 02:47 PM
eastgermanautos

Quote:

Originally Posted by Burney

(well, a save the date) to their marriage in July 2019.
This morning I received a card saying it was postponed until 2021. :hehe:
This is the same man who had a vasectomy on a 9-month work secondment to Sydney and has still never told her.

It’s never, ever happening, is it? :hehe:

I could never understand having a vasectomy. Why not rather have a troop of unacknowledged basterds roaming the streets? That would be my preference.
11-26-2018, 02:52 PM
Sir C

Quote:

Originally Posted by Burney

(well, a save the date) to their marriage in July 2019.
This morning I received a card saying it was postponed until 2021. :hehe:
This is the same man who had a vasectomy on a 9-month work secondment to Sydney and has still never told her.

It’s never, ever happening, is it? :hehe:

Is that himself and herself? She who was the facial recipient of your Da's balls?
11-26-2018, 02:58 PM
Monty92

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sir C

Is that himself and herself? She who was the facial recipient of your Da's balls?

Burney's dad spaffed over Burney's friend's fiancée's face?
11-26-2018, 03:00 PM
Sir C

Quote:

Originally Posted by Monty92

Burney's dad spaffed over Burney's friend's fiancée's face?

No, he merely thrust his scrotum into her face whilst reciting Yeats.

It was a quite remarkable sight.
11-26-2018, 03:10 PM
IUFG

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sir C

No, he merely thrust his scrotum into her face whilst reciting Yeats.

It was a quite remarkable sight.

https://media.giphy.com/media/YI0HM7ix6pFbW/200.gif
11-26-2018, 03:14 PM
Burney

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sir C

Is that himself and herself? She who was the facial recipient of your Da's balls?

That’s the chap. To be fair, by that stage, even my da’s balls would’ve been more use to her than her betrothed’s.
11-26-2018, 03:15 PM
Sir C

Quote:

Originally Posted by Burney

That’s the chap. To be fair, by that stage, even my da’s balls would’ve been more use to her than her betrothed’s.

Hmm. Does he have commitment issues?
11-26-2018, 03:26 PM
Burney

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sir C

Hmm. Does he have commitment issues?

Do you know, I think he might.
11-26-2018, 03:27 PM
Sir C

Quote:

Originally Posted by Burney

Do you know, I think he might.

She should remove access to sexual areas imo.
11-26-2018, 03:29 PM
7sisters

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sir C

Hmm. Does he have commitment issues?

I thought you were speaking about Jorge. He seems to have dodged that bullet for years..
11-26-2018, 03:30 PM
Sir C

Quote:

Originally Posted by 7sisters

I thought you were speaking about Jorge. He seems to have dodged that bullet for years..

Avoided being committed, you say? Sadly, menaical leftism is no cause for sectioning these days.

Odd, but there you are.