11 Exceptionally beautiful (9)
Answer: angelical
Really? :rubchin:
Printable View
11 Exceptionally beautiful (9)
Answer: angelical
Really? :rubchin:
not an answer I would immediately think of, tbf.
https://www.wordplays.com/crossword-...ally-beautiful
who knew?
did you see University Challenge the other night?
we have our new Bobby Seagull.
https://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/newpix/2...4247899235.jpg
fúck me, even the UC crowd are becoming 'celebrities' now
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-45217265
https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/660/cp...c6adfe9ee1.jpg
Probability theory says "The outcome of a random event cannot be determined before it occurs."
But the quantum eraser variation on the double split experiment shows that's bøllocks.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H6HLjpj4Nt4&t=14s
The first entangled particle know which random path its twin will take before it reaches the first of the two splitters than randomly send it in different directions.
It's fücking mind-blowing.
Ah, the old non-local connectivity chestnut. Information moving freely in time-and-space? Or seemingly disparate events linked through another, invisible dimension. I prefer the latter as a conceptual model, but the first is more spooky and therefore, fun. :thumbup:
No need to get all maudlin about it.
Actually that doesn't really work, but more importantly, how have we got this far in a thread about crosswords without someone pointing to the fact that crossword buffs tend to be pompous, arrogant, aloof, sneering, self-aggrandising and condescending snobs like MORSE?
You seem to have misspelt 'Burney' there, Ash. :hehe:
And yes, anyone that equates being good at puzzles like crosswords with intellect is probably by definition a bit thick. I've become much better at them just by trying them most days and getting used to them
Which has nothing to do with intellect whatsoever, of course.