Strong rumours that AFC are offering Chambers & £40million for Van Dijk.
Strong rumours that AFC are offering Chambers & £40million for Van Dijk.
Rich I'm going to be very upset with you if you're bull****ting me
Dreams can come trueQuote:
Originally Posted by Rich
Clearly it's beyond you to post a link to said video.
This would put our net spend behind Huddersfield's. War chest!!!
He is in fact bull****ting you. I'm sorry. :-(Quote:
Originally Posted by The Rob2
All will become clear in the next two weeks, TR2. All will become clear.Quote:
Originally Posted by The Rob2
:-)
I suspect I am in the minority who thinks we should be targeting a central defender this summer.
The suggestion of 40m + Chambers for van Dijk would make sense if it were not us.
Apparently he wants CL football so has ruled us out. Chelsea favourites at £60million.Quote:
Originally Posted by SWv2
We could do with a genuinely great one but there aren't any. We are comparatively blessed in having one of the best around (Koscielny) a couple of big strapping Germans and a decent looking young English one.Quote:
Originally Posted by SWv2
Whereas in midfield we have a collection of the sick, the lame and the horrible. Midfielder for me.
Don’t be a dick Richard.Quote:
Originally Posted by Rich
Yes he may want CL football but so did Lacazette.
He is desperate to leave Southampton and has more or less burnt his bridges at said club. He is really in little position to rule us out.
We are despite our EL status a massive step up from Southampton and VvD would jump at the chance of joining us, leading us into a bright new future and essentially doubling his wages or something along those lines. What is needed is an aggressive approach to the deal, a take it or leave it offer to force the hand of all parties, no room for third party gazumping. If his agent the solicits the interest of City and/or Chelsea then we **** him off.
Look at you.... a decent season of football management and you are now dictationg how it shoud be done.Quote:
Originally Posted by SWv2
I agree with you BTW
City have spent around one quarter of a billion pounds of their defence in the last few weeks. I don't think they'd take him. Chelsea have Cahill, Rudiger and the Spanish lads. Perhaps room for one more there.Quote:
Originally Posted by SWv2
Your suggestion that we'd take a 'no dithering' approach to a transfer is so left-field that it's beyond laughable.
I think you will find that SW is saying that is how we SHOULD conduct this transfer, not that we would conduct it like that.Quote:
Originally Posted by Rich
This strong rumour you mentioned seems to a bloke on twitter, which is where you seem to get most of your info from
Decent? Decent!!!!Quote:
Originally Posted by Pokster
P14, W14, D0, L0.
Bald ****.
New season in two weeks, newly promoted. We are going to get battered. :-(
I'm expecting we will get battered, first seaon of 9 a side and our players are too nice, wait until they meet some of the inner city Leeds teams and they will get a shockQuote:
Originally Posted by SWv2
Which age group is it? Chances are the better teams are cheaty bāstardos two years older than they should be.Quote:
Originally Posted by SWv2
FA have clamped down on that.. from Under 11's upawards they need photo proof of who is playing and that can be checked on the FA website as all players have to prove their age......... that, in theory is how it worksQuote:
Originally Posted by Ash
U10 but must be born in 2007.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ash
Most sides have 1-2 players who stand out, even the ****ter teams. Definitely a few ringers played last season all the same.