zero chance of finishing above them at the end of the season.
Well, all things considered, it still felt half-decent, didn’t it?
zero chance of finishing above them at the end of the season.
Well, all things considered, it still felt half-decent, didn’t it?
I think he's suggesting that there is a media-driven narrative, or concensus, if you will, that Spurs are everything that is wonderful and we are proper shíte; I would be inclined to agree with him in this matter.
I noted with amusement last week that several football journalists had stated that not a single Arsenal player would get into the Spurs first Xl; others grudgingly allowed us 1 or 2 players of sufficient quality to grace the white shirt. This is all obviously hyperbolic bóllocks, as it were, as demonstrated by Saturday's result.
That's monty's point, I think. I can't see that he's made anything up.
I did comment to a few chaps in the pub on Saturday morning that there is an awful lot of excessive nonsense written about us in the media. Yes we have the ability to be utter shíte and no we will not win the league this or perhaps any year soon but we were going into Saturday with 10 games unbeaten, or maybe 10 wins in a row, at the Emirates and that Spurs were not miles ahead on points.
Of course some of this was pre-game bravado but the gap was never as big as reported, and the reaction to their beating Madrid was as excessive as the nonsense written at times about us.
The Journalists that do that do it for clicks.. works a treat, they come out with some *******s to get people up in arms and tweeting their disgust.
I didn't see anyone say we had zero chance of winning on Saturday, nobody who has any sense would say that as it is plainly *******s
how many of this arsenal 11 would get into the Tottenham team." Then, 10 minutes into to match when we had calmly and efficiently passed the ball out of defence, he claimed we had 'scrambled' the ball out.
The MOTD edit of the match was also clearly contrived to make it look as though Tottenham had all the possession and chances - someone at MOTD clearly does not like us. What gave it the lie was Shearer saying how brilliant we had been. They can't manipulate and edit the post match analysis...yet.
AND! - since when does a referee allow an exrta minute to the standard two minutes of injury time at half time? When it's Mike '****yBollox' Dean and Tottenham are in possession, that's when."
There was a terrible one in the Times preaching how Pochettino made every player he touched better and every player now under Wenger is going backwards. To illustrate his point, the writer used the statistic of Özil assists for Real Madrid v the number he has made for Arsenal. Of course, it is considerably fewer for the latter. He made the concession that the English league may be harder - didn't mention other small factors like Cristiano Ronaldo. ****ing idiot - the writer not you
ftr it is 11 straight league wins at the Emirates (15 wins two draws in all comps since out last loss)
Yes, I noticed the 'scrambled' comment with disbelief.
Fúck 'em, they've always hated us, from the 70s when we were 'lucky Arsenal' to the 80s and 90s when we were 'boring' (we were), then too foreign. Now it's just instinctive, kick the ársenal at every opportunity.
Fúck 'em again.
Yes, it was rather funny watching Spurs transform from the mighty slayers of Real Madrid who fart lightning, shït thunder and generally represent all that's great about English football into a bunch of underachievers who never beat any of their top six rivals in the space of a couple of hours.
I didnt watch it but I have seen the highlights. It seems that if you field your best eleven and ask them to put some serious effort in you can achieve some pleasing results.
I wonder if we will continue this experiment, or was it just a special event for the North London derby?
If I may allow myself one tiny moan. Well, actually, two or three. Five, in total.
THe constant whining about the free kick got on my nerves a little. Firstly, its a free kick- not a penalty, not a guy clean through on goal, not a free hit. A free kick 30 yards out. Defend it and shut up. It is not, of itself, a game changing moment.
Secondly, Dean clearly indicates that he gave it for some kind of shirt-pulling/ holding att he shoulder, by tapping his shoulder repeatedly and tugging at it. So why did the pundits keep re running the second part, the actual tackle, and saying 'I cant see a foul there'.
THirdly, Mustafi is not 'clearly offside'. If he is offside at all it is by an inch at shoulder. So marginal as to fall under serious doubt.
Fourthly, Lacazette is not offside for the second goal. THere is no debate, nor controversy. He is onside.
Finally, why was Pocchetino moaning about Xhaka getting a second yellow? I saw no such incident.
Wouldn't that kind of fabrication get the Beeb in hot water? Sort of thing they've been in trouble for too often over the last decade.
I doubt he would have made his comment about starting 11's with the knowledge that we would out-play, out-fight and out-score the Middlesex vermin.
Eric Dier gave an interview after the game where he spoke at length about how impossible it is to get something from a game like this when the ref keeps making mistakes against you. At the end he said 'but we are not looking to make any excuses' :hehe::hehe:
I watched the last 15 minutes. Some admirable defending and a wonderful save from Cech. Quite enjoyable. A poor header from Bellerin nearly cost us and there were two counter attacks where Ozil was clearly exhausted. I also saw Coquelin play himself into trouble and then buy a foul with some clever body movement- very nice.
Garth Crooks is on wonderfully sanctimonious form this morning but even for that thick **** this is special - commenting on Mesut Özil:
"You have to go back to the days of former Arsenal greats like Alan Ball, Charlie George and Liam Brady to see a glimpse of real genius wearing the famous cannon on their chest. But not any more."
Erm - Garth - you may have missed a few years
Perhaps they record the opening salvo in real time, if they know it'll be a top-billed game, and add the rest on afterwards. Most MOTD commentary seems fake to me. He was shouting about the 'controversial' free kick a bit too much in real time to sound credible. It did look a decent shout for a foul in real time.
I think he felt Xhaka should have had one a few minutes before, in which case he probably wouldn't have made the one he did get a card for. There was also a little tug on shirt midway through 2nd half which was given as a foul but no spurs player appealed for anything more.
So....pretty much nothing then.
I also noticed not one Spurs player claimed offside for the first goal. So it was so obvious that not a single player spotted it? Or the linesman?
Clutching at straws. When I saw the highlights I was kind of hoping it was miles offside :****er:
That dreadful foul by Harry Kane the one where Mike Dean did not have a clue what had happened was cut out of the highlights
Editing cunds