Seriously, What planet is she on ? She's clearly never worked in an all female office environment. :cooper:
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-49314840
Seriously, What planet is she on ? She's clearly never worked in an all female office environment. :cooper:
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-49314840
Techinically, none of us on awimb have, unless there are some women actually on here. I do agree it is remarkably stupid idea though.Quote:
Originally Posted by 7sisters
. . . . . . . .Quote:
Originally Posted by 7sisters
People who propose voting Green as though it were some sort of cuddly alternative to voting Labour astonish me. Have they never actually looked at their policies? They're as red as a baboon's arse and even more scarily ideological and anti-human.Quote:
Originally Posted by Luis Anaconda
You're assuming genders you bigot.Quote:
Originally Posted by Luis Anaconda
PC Burney - I like itQuote:
Originally Posted by Burney
Ok. Ref: all female teams, on ITV Apprentice for the past 10 seasons?Quote:
Originally Posted by Luis Anaconda
:hehe: Very good exampleQuote:
Originally Posted by 7sisters
absolutely disgraceful behaviour, isn't it, b?Quote:
Originally Posted by Burney
and btw... http://www.gq-magazine.co.uk/culture...greta-thunberg
a child. a female child.
Yeah, but they're more anti-Brexit and less anti-Semitic than the party I've just quit so they got my vote in the locals.Quote:
Originally Posted by Burney
Didn't bother with the manifesto, but if they want to nationalise people like you and feed you to polar bears or whatever, that's fine by me. No offence, like.
That child looks like something out of a horror movie.Quote:
Originally Posted by IUFG
Well you probably ought to be a bit more curious. Just for starters, there's their economic manifesto, in which they essentially outline their plans to destroy the UK's financial sector. They also want to tax pretty much everything, restrict the number of journeys people are allowed to take. There's even a brilliant bit where they admit that most of their policies are impossible to implement while being a member of the EU, but blithely insist that they will simply reform the EU so that it's more to their liking. :hehe:Quote:
Originally Posted by Ganpati's Goonerz--AFC's Aboriginal Fertility Cult
https://policy.greenparty.org.uk/ec.html
Honestly, they are idiots and they are totally fúcking nuts, which doesn't really reflect well on anyone who votes for them.
Saying that the leaders of the 2 main party's are idiots and ****ing nuts as wellQuote:
Originally Posted by Burney
Yeah, but they can't implement any of that as a local councillor, and my vote really pissed of my Corbynista mates which is the most important thing, politically.Quote:
Originally Posted by Burney
My very limited understanding of global warming is that without some as yet unforeseen miracle, all this climate rebellion lot are at least one, probably two, generations too late.
Basically, if they stuff when I started looking into this in the '90s is right then we're fücked. We're actually ahead of schedule and the feedback cycles will start kicking in more.
As James Lovelock - inventor of Gaia theory and former MI5 Q - said, we might as well razz our Ferraris as it's all too late. We should have listened to him in the '80s.
So anyway, as we're all gonna die, we might as well throw a few Tories to the polar beers as a sop to Cerberus. Polar beers are more endangered than Tories unfortunately, and they're a damned sight nicer.
But yes, Green politics is ****ed, because even if they could persuade all the European voters to vote for economic penury, they won't be able to do that in the US, China and India and the rest of the 3rd world will quite happily fück the planet if it enriches the ruling regimes.
So it's pointless as far as I can see. Though I still think the likes of you should be fed to polar beers if they're feeling peckish due to lack of sea ice. Though perhaps we could compromise on feeding the poor bears on Corbynistas?
The ****s here have managed to get the government to agree to introduce a tax on any textiles that contain chemicals by 2022. A party with less than 5% of the vote dictating taxation policy! Sick of it.Quote:
Originally Posted by Burney
He turned 100 the other day, Lovelock. More recently, he's recanted many of his more alarmist views. He hates the idea of sustainable development, hates wind turbines and supports LNG and fracking. Indeed, in 2012, he was quoted thusly:Quote:
Originally Posted by Ganpati's Goonerz--AFC's Aboriginal Fertility Cult
Quote:
The problem is we don't know what the climate is doing. We thought we knew 20 years ago. That led to some alarmist books – mine included – because it looked clear-cut, but it hasn't happened.
The climate is doing its usual tricks. There’s nothing much really happening yet. We were supposed to be halfway toward a frying world now.
The world has not warmed up very much since the millennium. Twelve years is a reasonable time ... it (the temperature) has stayed almost constant, whereas it should have been rising — carbon dioxide is rising, no question about that.[30]
Well you do live in the home of Greater Thunderbug, bgm.Quote:
Originally Posted by Billy Goat Sverige
Not literally, of course. That would be weird.
The constantly increasing backing for Greens by corporates, royals, luvvies and elites off all stripes, all flying into Davos on their private jets to demand the oiks slash their living standards, makes a lie of the claim that Greens are true leftists.
The first political movement in history pledging to make poor people poorer.
It's almost as if there needs to be a world war to cleanse the planet of 3 billion people.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ash
That'll cut consumption a bit...
It'd have to be much bigger than the last two piddling efforts, iufg. They barely made a dent in global populations with their pathetic 85 million and 16 million death tolls. Even throwing in the Spanish Flu of 1918, the global populations have not merely recovered, but skyrocketed since 1945.Quote:
Originally Posted by IUFG
I'd estimate that the next war would need to kill a couple of billion people minimum to even slow things down a bit.
And therein is the misanthropic danger inherent in green politics. People are bad, mmmkay?Quote:
Originally Posted by IUFG
Kill them. KILL MOST OF THEM!
Yes. It's a little-mentioned fact that the upshot of the 'low growth/high tax/prohibitively costly fuel' thing is an awful lot of dead people.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ash
'Green' taxes on fuel kill tens of thousands of elderly people across Europe every year. Nobody seems to give a shít. It's weird.
Yes, yes, but old people are generally right-wingers, politically speaking (I think that is how it works, well according to Twitter anyway); so that's absolutely fine.Quote:
Originally Posted by Burney
Talking of that sort of thing, I'm very much enjoying the government trolling Remain loons with the Brexit 50p. They're properly losing their shít. :hehe:Quote:
Originally Posted by IUFG
ah! the new Blue Passport, I see.Quote:
Originally Posted by Burney