Apart from anything else, didn't this whole problem start because a white guy decided kneeling would be a good idea? :shrug:
Printable View
Apart from anything else, didn't this whole problem start because a white guy decided kneeling would be a good idea? :shrug:
It's the left's basic 'long march through the institutions' strategy in action. Get authority figures to demean and humiliate themselves, thereby removing all respect for them. Then smash them apart and leave nothing standing. Then allow hard-left politics to fill the vacuum.
It's been going on for about 50 years.
Common Purpose will stop at nothing to bring down decadent, democratic capitalism; a few dead rioters and ruined livelihoods are a mere detail.
They were relatively calm whilst they had their soyboys Obama and Cameron safely installed, but the orange lunatic is driving them utterly mental.
Nothing would suit them better than a civil war in the US and UK; they can pick through the rubble at the end and install the true Global Marxism they so devoutly seek.
I'm taking my ponies off to the hills a-sap.
Civilisations fall to the barbarians because they lose the will and belief in themselves not to. It really is true.
A healthy, non-decadent society that believed in itself would be shooting these people. Instead, we have most of our institutions cheering them on. It's totally f@cked.
A healthy, non-decadent society would shoot people for non-violent protest against what they view as an immoral act?
Whereas an unhealthy, decadent society would listen to them and then try and address any valid concerns they raised?
Interesting. By which I mean insane.
Trump has probably never used the word ‘nuanced’ in his life.
And while I agree that the current trend towards labels and silos in any debate is dull, it is also potentially very dangerous. Especially when the president of the US of A seems incapable of any other type of thought.
Who's talking about 'non-violent protest'? I'm talking about feral scum rioting and looting. The non-violent protest ship sailed some time ago.
Oh, and what 'legitimate concerns' do young British people have about the behaviour of the Minneapolis Police Department, exactly? And how exactly does attacking members of the Met help address them?
You can do the googling yourself, but there are the pictures of policemen kneeling before the same people who attacked them minutes later. There are endless media and political figures applauding exactly the same people who then - inevitably - went on to riot.
You can't separate the 'good' protest from the 'bad' riot because it's exactly the same people and it was always going to end the same way. If you encouraged this nonsense in any form, you encouraged its outcome. You don't get to cheer it all the way until the first brick is inevitably thrown and then wash your hands of it. You are culpable. You can't just abdicate moral responsibility for your actions like that.
We had a female police officer “bend the knee” yesterday in front of the protesters, holding a “white silence is violence” banner whilst doing it. She then got up and started hugging a load of them and burst in to tears. Catching Covid-19 is too good for some of this lot.
No institutions other than the media, the police and the political establishment, no.
Here's the Mayor of London at lunchtime yesterday:
"The death of George Floyd has rightly ignited fury and anguish not just in the USA but around the world. No country, city, police force or institution can be complacent about racism and the impact this has."
A few hours later and guess what? The pack of feral hoodrats he has encouraged to come into the heart of his city with their righteously ignited 'fury' interpret this as a free opportunity to have a go at the police because racism.
Only then does he say it's unacceptable to attack the police.
He set the police up as targets, encouraged the mob to have a go at them and then walked away.
You can't incite that sort of shít and then tut tut at its outcomes. It's like w@nking someone off and then complaining that your hand's covered in spunk.
"The death of George Floyd has rightly ignited fury and anguish not just in the USA but around the world. No country, city, police force or institution can be complacent about racism and the impact this has."
Sounds like an incredibly reasonable statement. I doubt anybody at yesterday's gatherings even heard Khan's words, let alone acted on them.
Hopefully the scum attacking the police will be dealt with properly. He's made the right statement in that respect, hopefully action will follow.
On the day he'd allowed the gathering of thousands (during a pandemic and against social distancing measures, but hey-ho), he talks about igniting fury? When he could at least have demanded a peaceful response? You don't see that as in any way inflammatory, no?
Not only is that statement encouraging a gathering that is completely unacceptable in the current situation, it's also validating not just anger but 'fury'. And, not only does it not bother to make the point that the Met has absolutely no culpability, but in fact it goes out of its way to tar them with the same brush!
'Incredibly reasonable'? Bóllocks. Inflammatory and irresponsible rhetoric from a man who is actually charged with the welfare of the city in which he's just helped to foment rioting.
I've sussed it B, America's grand plan. White cozzer kills black bloke in broad daylight in front of cameras. Protests (riots) begin mainly from the BAME community. All ignoring social distancing and we know the virus has got it in for the brothers so we're looking at possibly hundreds of thousands of dead negros. USA depopulation in full effect y'all. It's genius really. Tragic but genius from the honkies.