is that nobody appears to give a fvck about it.
The only vaguely interesting revelation is that that sanctimonious cvnt Bono is an absolutely massive fvcking hypocrite. And we all knew that already. :shrug:
is that nobody appears to give a fvck about it.
The only vaguely interesting revelation is that that sanctimonious cvnt Bono is an absolutely massive fvcking hypocrite. And we all knew that already. :shrug:
Would be quite funny if Moshiri and Usmanov get in trouble - other than that no real surpriseQuote:
Originally Posted by Burney
You're good at sums b. Does it mean I can have my employers pay my pitiful salary into a bank account in Mauritius and simply borrow my own money at favourable interest rates, zero I think, and it will be perfectly legal?Quote:
Originally Posted by Burney
It's just that the lice ridden vermin of HMRC appear to delight in absolutely rinsing my pay packet before I ever get a sniff of it.
Rich ****s dont pay tax. How they avoid it isn't really that interestingQuote:
Originally Posted by Burney
It's just **** this, fanny dancing that, bull**** the other with you these days, p. When did you turn into a slightly less charming version of RCEGQuote:
Originally Posted by Peter
I believe The Premier League prohibits any club owner or director from having an interest in another club, or the ability to influence another club's policies.Quote:
Originally Posted by Luis Anaconda
As Usmanov is neither an owner of, or director at, The Arsenal, I don't think he has anything to fear, shirley?
Moshiri on the other hand, who gives a ****?
I imagine the Premier League employs guidelines, rather than actual rules. We can't risk frightening all that money off, can we.Quote:
Originally Posted by IUFG
More embarrassment that punishment in Usmanov's case but there are rules about anyone who owns over 10 per cent of shares in one club having anything to do with any other sharewise. Would also prejudice any case in the future if he were to want to buy a club.Quote:
Originally Posted by IUFG
Fit and proper owners and all that :hehe: :hehe: :hehe: :hehe:
Poor chap clearly has rapid onset Tourette's ( ya **** )Quote:
Originally Posted by Luis Anaconda
#Kronkout.Quote:
Originally Posted by Luis Anaconda
It's probably the increasingly sanitised nature of real life that leads me to swear like a docker on here.Quote:
Originally Posted by Luis Anaconda
In real life I am still an absolute delight :p
I doubt they even know how they're paying less tax. Some accountant just gets them to sign the odd piece of paper and does everything for them.Quote:
Originally Posted by Burney
Right. It's just business.Quote:
Originally Posted by PSRB
Good to know, p :thumbup:Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter
Some inside information there, prsb ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by PSRB
It's the politics of envy, b. All those socialists at the Guardian and the BBC, busy peering over the fence to see what their neighbours are doing.Quote:
Originally Posted by Burney
Wánkers to a man.
Only until we give the ball away in midfield for the fifth time in a row playing a risky sideways pass on the edge of the opposition box with 8 players ahead of the ****ing ball and the defence ten yards inside the ****ing opposition half :mad::mad:Quote:
Originally Posted by Luis Anaconda
Tax avoidance v Tax evasion.
One of them is okay, one is illegal. Cool with me.
I would avoid / evade if I knew how. Wd Mrs Brown and Paul Hewson.
p.s. nothing to do with their Irishness
The point is you have to pay to avoid - obviously not as much but a fair amount. I went on a freebie to the Euro 2004 final thanks to BENQ who were one of the sponsors. Got chatting to a lad who was basically an accountant specialising in tax avoidance and had several high profile clients (including the company who was paying **** loads for the five-star hotel and free star and alcohol). He was wonderfully indiscreet about who he worked for and how he worked - quite eye-opening on the whole subject and basically said that there was really nothing governments could do about it and as as long as rich people had money to hire cleverer people than governments did there would always be loopholes to exploitQuote:
Originally Posted by SWv2
Who you callin' a wánker, wánkerQuote:
Originally Posted by Sir C
Times has been obsessed with it this week as well though. Not sure you would call them socialists. Though still quite dullQuote:
Originally Posted by Sir C
:nod: As long as they don't advise on things that might happen and only on what they can currently do, then all fair, according to lawQuote:
Originally Posted by Luis Anaconda
And governments know this very well, of course, so the best they can do is a bit of virtue-signalling and SJW-ing.Quote:
Originally Posted by Luis Anaconda
If you own over a certain % of shares you are fobidden to own any shares in another teamQuote:
Originally Posted by IUFG
300 journalists had access to those docs for a year and have come up with jack **** really
The panorama programme was a waste of time. I couldn’t follow their explanation of one of the schemes and I implement them every day as part of my job!
All in all very Arsenal. Promised to deliver so much and yet failed
Well, there you are then. Bono. That's enough. It certainly makes me very happy, this news. But there's a whole list of fvckheads: Apple, rich pricks the world over, this politician over here who seems to be profiting directly from his role in the govt. All in all I'd say it's a worthwhile little trove.Quote:
Originally Posted by Burney
Right. It's just banter really. There's no harm in rattling a few cages once in a while.Quote:
Originally Posted by eastgermanautos
Anyway, they can take it.