He must be a nightmare to work for.....:)
Printable View
He must be a nightmare to work for.....:)
Also, let's be honest: Jerusalem is the capital of Israel. And the joos bleeding well founded the place. I don't care if Muhammad did fly there on a magic horse (for the record, he didn't) - that doesn't give Palestinians any property rights.
Palestinians can fück off.
It is, yes. One can also argue that Congress decreed it was years ago but successive Presidents have simply put that in their pocket.
But here is the thing.....he causes all this **** storm and gains pretty much **** all. His base love it, but they love him anyway.
It is almost as though his base just love seeing him annoying people that they dont like.
He is a WUM....
Well....duh.
Of course they do. They mostly voted for him to annoy the sort of people who'd be annoyed by him becoming President. And that is as good a reason as any to elect someone President if you ask me.
I'll be honest: I'd have voted for him if I'd been a Yanqui.
He is the prime example of just how far you can go by being a complete ****. He's not particularly bright, has all the charm of a reptile, is devoid of warmth and humour, a sociopath in fact, and had to be rescued by his daddy when his construction exploits went tits up.
But for all that he is what we deserve. He is a creation of the the free world.
:nod: You can't vote for old women who poo themselves and keep falling over, ffs!
Attachment 823
It is a dreadful reason for voting for someone. Wanting to keep the opposing candidate out is a perfectly good reason though. I suspect this explains the majority of voting on both sides of this election. Two of the most divisive and despised candidates in history.
Perhaps from the one year of investigation by Mueller's team which has failed to prove complicity between Trump and Russia despite it being printed as fact in the papers every day. One of these investigators, Peter Strzok, who was fired by Mueller for political bias, had previously let Hillary off the hook for her private email server.
Burney "There are no bad reasons to vote for someone, p. Because, even if the reason seems frivolous or superficial, the fact that you are reduced to such frivolity and superficiality is in itself a legitimate verdict on the choices one is being offered."
:nod:
A bit like wanting Chelsea to win the league last season
It's actually more predictable than that. After all, if it were everyone whom you objected to, that would be a wide-ranging and eccentric list. 538 Blog analyzed it. His only solid and unswerving base of support is religious conservatives. They've got his back. However, this also means that he can deny them nothing. He therefore is working with all speed to enact what they wish. Jerusalem was one of these high-priority demands.
Of course, but not in the way you mean, I think. Pointing out what's wrong with him always, and only, seems to draw closer attention to what's even worse about his opposition. Or how any such specific objections to him remind everyone that they would be better, more justifiably, aimed at them #BoomerangEffect
That's true if you only pay attention to his silliest and most popular tweets though; there's already been plenty of real substance, or "winning", as they're calling it, to keep conservatives happy enough. And lots to encourage people who thought he'd be a total disaster to give him the benefit of the doubt next time around.
The Supreme Court, the stock market, GDP, unemployment, business investment and confidence, tax reform, Paris, Energy, Net Neutrality, The VA, NATO, illegal immigration, his new voter fraud investigation commission and so on.
Trade could be a banana skin for some true conservatives, of course, and it's naturally still early days, but he's doing alright, I reckon. Any first year Republican president would be happy with that.
Oh, and for anyone curious about Peter Strzok (remember the name, he may become famous) with seven minutes to spare might find this at least entertaining, and possibly interesting.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NtB2...ature=youtu.be
Some readable links, for those who don't like watching videos (the clip is good though, and Christopher Wreh is in it).
http://www.powerlineblog.com/archive...ter-strzok.php
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/ji...rticle/2642851
I don't really call a lot of these victories. They're simply negations of the previous guy, and as such, are subject again to reversal. Of your list, I would say: economy (a biggie, not that's all him. But it is definitely in part him), the supreme court, and environmental ****e. The rest is a bunch of crap. Oh, and war with north korea is a win. In my book. But that's because I favor canned foods and time off for reading in my bunker. ;-)
I guess part of me just doesn't understand how an ostensibly fair-minded person could not look at this and dismiss it as minor. Or at least, as no less minor than all the other people in the current administration who use their private email, etc., sometimes on non-encrypted phones. Kushner, Kelly, and so on. There's just no sense of fairness, just a general repetition of this one point. One might even suspect that you had been listening to infowars, fox news, or the washington examiner...
Jk, you know I love yalls. :titsup: