It’s like watching a glass of water.
Printable View
It’s like watching a glass of water.
An own goal and two set pieces.
But, and I'm only being generous cos Ozil started:
1. We did get so many corners we were bound to score at least one eventually.
2. Ozil did about half a dozen flicks that, while none worked, were sexy. I don't mind us giving the ball away like that cos if it had worked it would have led to a sexy goal.
At this point I honestly don’t know if you guys are serious or trolling.
There wasn’t anything remotely enjoyable about losing to Forest, Bayern 10-2, Palace 3-0 with Flamini who supposedly wasn’t good enough for us or even drawing 1-1 vs 10 man mamagerless Atletico. Never mind all of the horrific defeats over the past few years.
Don’t get this Wengerball stuff...we haven’t seen that since the Invincible season and we’re talking about someone who made close to £200m off of us down the years...you shouldn’t feel sorry for him. He was well looked after and has no interest of ever getting back into football.
And I’m unsure why people have turned on Unai.
We all knew and accepted this season was about him and the players working together and we wouldn’t see real changes until Year 2 or 3 of his time here.
Not sure why this has changed especially given out injuries and the clear incompetency of some of our players.
Actually think people owe him an apology.
Ozil is fit and duly started last night. Even got the captain’s armband towards the end.
There is clearly no rift between the two and Unai has simply been covering for the lad until he was fully fit.
Very interesting game of football that and we were, despite your protestations, never even close to going out. Over 180 minutes they were only within one goal with us for about 30, for the majority of the tie we were two clear :vsign:
I also enjoyed last night, though. I love it when our centre backs score :oldschool:
bitch whining for all that interminable tippy tappy Wengerball bóllocks. The object of any sporting contest is the win the ****.
Did I mention last year or Wenger? You oddballs are obsessed with the past. I spoke only of last night.
It was dull and not pleasant to watch. You can argue with that statement, and I'll debate you, but your response is a rant against our old manager who has no control over what happens now. Odd.
Quite incredible statement really given that such flicks are often used as the primary reason many use to criticise Ramsey.
It really is a funny old game.
The only issue of any importance last evening was to win the tie, the performance or quality of football a complete irrelevance. We are through and we await the draw.
Despite the stadium sounding like a busy shopping mall, I agree with LA (to add to your centre-backs scoring cloud9...defenders clearing off the line :cloud9: )
An intriguing match for the connoisseur in which the ref should have blown for time 5-10 minutes earlier
Paddy McGinty might be confusing him with WES
To start with, my question was aimed at AFC E who is obviously trying to make a point thta under UE we play bland football, my point was that we also played bland football ast year.
I think the future is positive under UE, he can get rid fo some of the players who don't seem to buy into his ideas and can get in players that will suit his style of football. This will take time as we have a lot of chaf to get rid of
"as the primary reason many use"
Many, not Ganpati.
Which is why I did not criticise the fella, merely pointed out the game to be a funny old game in the context of how one person can be driven demented by an action that another appreciates.
Don't try and pick a fight with me you Dutch fanny.
Excuse me, I fought through two world wars to protect freedom of expression and I consider myself free to express my view without be silenced by you, you jobbie-tugging bully.
If we had had the internet in the early '90s you would have seen me expressing a similar view about George Graham and his 'style' of football. So suck it up, ponceboy. You will never silence me.