That's unfair. Surely it was more important that t'were done,
rather than that it were done well? In these interesting times anyway.
No, that's the medium, I'm afraid.
It has to be done and done well. The more incendiary the subject is the more crucial it is that its funny.
Funny of you to mention the Python guys. Let's take a look at the reaction of
But why should it be so incendiary?
Anything to do with what it says in their made up holy book, per chance?
Or just the wrong kind of muslim
What difference does it make? You admit you'd never heard of them until after they'd been offed.
Maybe a better, or at least more modern, comparison would be Jerry Springer The Opera
Bit less in-your-face, but they should really be turning the other cheek.
http://s1.reutersmedia.net/resources...KOP_0_PICTURE0
Are you familiar with the old testament, at all?
Also, you do know that depicting Mo is considered haraam as it is, so if you're depicting him negatively that's worse squared?
I'm not defending what they did, and you know full well that my point isnt about that. I just really wish we were talking about something better here.
What you've just done there is point out something that everyone knows already: that there are
non-muslim religious fanatics too.
So thank you for wasting our time.
Did they ever find Stewart Lee's headless body, by the way?
What you’ve just done there is point out something that every body knows already; that there are
holy books other than the Koran that include repugnant doctrines.
So thank you for wasting our time. Again.
