You would do well not to trust scientists.
1. Most of them work ast universities - in effect, still at school when they're 50.
2. They have to publish stuff to get a grant every year, so guess what? THEY MAKE SHÍT UP.
3. White-coated workshy ****s.
You would do well not to trust scientists.
1. Most of them work ast universities - in effect, still at school when they're 50.
2. They have to publish stuff to get a grant every year, so guess what? THEY MAKE SHÍT UP.
3. White-coated workshy ****s.
Which slave trade, i? There was the Arab slave trade (which pre-dated ours by some centuries) and then the Portugee and the Spaniards were at it long before we got in on the act.
What you mean, of course, is that it should date from the involvement of white, English-speaking males (Boo! Hiss!, etc) in doing slavery, which can basically be traced to the foundation of the Royal African Company in (I think) 1660-1670-ish? No other slavery before that counts.