So all in all the Brexit is just a complicated equivalent of a Awimb flounce?
So all in all the Brexit is just a complicated equivalent of a Awimb flounce?
Hold on now. I nearly ended up engaging in fisticuffs on one occasion defending TH for the handball, my assertion being that every footballer would have done the same thing at that time.
:-(
My issue with Henry is his missing that chance in Paris in 2006 but it would be extremely harsh to hold that against a man who provided so many great moments for us.
Not at first, but it's a bit more resilient than yours, which is dependent on exporting to us to an extent that makes any interruption potentially catastrophic.
Believe me it would give me no pleasure, but if it happens, it will in no small part be because your government has placed pro-EU virtue-signalling and a bit of good, old-fashioned Brit-bashing over the immediate economic interests of the country. They should be held accountable if that happens.
I thought the Orange lot did not want the back stop being that it would essentially mean they were being treated differently to the rest of the UK which is the one thing they cherish more than anything, their being part of "the Union".
Backstop essentially means no border and Ireland being one country.
And all together now, 1 - 2 - 3 ......
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=88-qgHh31bw
and the crowd went wild...
http://www.newsfour.ie/wp-content/up...-relations.jpg
Under transition, EU law will continue in the UK (Article 127), under the jurisdiction of the ECJ (Articles 86 and 131), and new laws will be framed by the EU with no input from the UK (Article 128). Transition can be extended (from Dec 2020) indefinitely, requiring further annual payments from the UK, which will be set by the EU. (Article 132).
We would not be allowed an independent trade policy, and would not even be allowed to fish in our own seas without EU permission.
:yikes: They appear to have turned him into George Berry. :hehe:
Attachment 1064
I'm no lawyer but I expect that selective bit of legalise refers specifically to the part of the withdrawal agreement that covers trade, and specific types of trade. The Tories have been clear and no one has challenged it, that if the backstop is invoked we do not have to pay EU fees, we have control of our borders and we can make our own laws all while having tariff free access to the common market.
The fishing bit is nonsense probably based on a perverse interpretation of the agreement. From that right wing rage the Guardian:
Fisheries
The EU has repeatedly said that it would only allow British seafood exporters tariff- and quota-free access to EU markets in exchange for a reciprocal agreement that EU fishing fleets can continue to operate in British waters.
This potentially explosive issue appears to have been kicked down the road: the withdrawal agreement essentially says only that the EU would apply tariffs on fish until a separate agreement was struck on access to EU fishing in UK waters.