Bit like saying it's better to step in cat shit than dog shit.
Both result in a less than ideal ****ty situation.
He's the second best Coq we have
OK, he might be more Ben Dover than Rocco Stiffredi but Arteta is Pele.
No, I have seen nothing of the game.
I believe his second was a thing of beauty / skuff off his shin.
His two goals won't change my opinion which is based on how I see his overall game in midfield.
Perhaps, in terms of like for like, which reflects well on your earlier sentence.
But it saddens me.
He is f**king useless and no end of rolled up sleeves and busy pointing and gesticulating will compensate for a general lack of football ability.
You didnt see any of his overall game in midfield though
would you honestly rather a rusty arteta play in the Coqblocker role against lester or the sleeveless corsican utility assasin-come-goalpoacher?
ty sw, always happy to look like a c*nt in a good cause
It sounds like a rant but it wasn't particularly, was more bewilderment.
Well you see that is a tough one.
But probably yes.
Both have limitations though Arteta is a much better footballer so I would go with him, perhaps with Ramsey alongside.
I have seen next to nothing from Flamini since his return to the club to suggest he is anywhere near good enough.
Only one person in the world saw a skuff off the shin, as far as I know.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GaLl9gx-KUA
The first was a Ramseyesque run into the box to follow up Ox's shot.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FB1tOvIymuo
All in all not bad for a man widely considered a bostonbrian.
