Should the loan of Jack Wilshere be questioned too?
Yes. We should've just sold the fùcker due to him being shït.
03-28-2017, 11:17 AM
Pat Vegas
Quote:
Originally Posted by Burney
Yes. We should've just sold the fùcker due to him being shït.
See the **** we've fallen for over the years.
I was under the impression Wilshere was some sort of footballing god.
03-28-2017, 11:19 AM
Burney
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pat Vegas
See the **** we've fallen for over the years.
I was under the impression Wilshere was some sort of footballing god.
Footballing gods tend not to get shipped out to Bournemouth on loan when they're 25 and should be in their prime.
03-28-2017, 11:22 AM
Pat Vegas
Quote:
Originally Posted by Burney
Footballing gods tend not to get shipped out to Bournemouth on loan when they're 25 and should be in their prime.
It's also a dumb move as now we've reduced his value. City would have bought him if we offered him imo
03-29-2017, 09:27 AM
redgunamo
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pat Vegas
wake up awimb.
in other news I've lost a stone since the 20th of feb.
I hope He's off somewhere celebrating His victory over His detractors. He deserves that, imo; their knives were *really* out for Him after the West Bromwich Albion game but He has seen them off.
03-29-2017, 09:30 AM
redgunamo
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pat Vegas
See the **** we've fallen for over the years.
I was under the impression Wilshere was some sort of footballing god.
A potential footballing god for *us*, I think it was. The new Bryan Robson and a' that, if he could stay fit.