I am seized with terror every time this happens now. :-(
I am seized with terror every time this happens now. :-(
Yes, on the positive side, we're sure to get a day off, but on the other hand, King Charles lll, quickly followed by the Republic of England and Wales under President-for-Life Corbyn :-(Quote:
Originally Posted by Burney
Don't worry b. The old parasite is probably even as we speak receiving an infusion of blood taken from the new born babes of honest working folk and she'll be bouncing back to her duties* in a trice.
*Quaffing gin at race meetings where everyone's been bribed to let her old nags win.
Is he definitely going to call himself Charles? As Royal names go, it's a 50:50 ball at best.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sir C
I do hope so, h. And I can tell you this: there isn't a decent, patriotic person in this country who would hesitate to hand over their newborn baby's blood for the continuation of Her reign.Quote:
Originally Posted by Herbert Augustus Chapman
Can he call himself whatever he wants then? That'll be fun. "King BloodSeed Tofari". I expect he'll have Diana Spencer posthumously whipped for her infidelities.Quote:
Originally Posted by Burney
Of course. The birth name and regnal name can be quite different. I think it's time for another Richard personally. Granted the last two rather let the side down, but we should give it a go.Quote:
Originally Posted by Herbert Augustus Chapman
:nod: With a bit of luck we'll all be pressed into Whitehall watching his head get lopped off.Quote:
Originally Posted by Burney
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ash
Charles I absolutely deserved it, though. Silly scotch arse.
Really b? King Dick!
I think his regnal name really should reflect the multi-cultural and diverse nation over which he will reign. King Toots