As the press have it in for Saurez (though he is making it easy) I find it odd that some newspapers

call him a chimp.

I think in the independent today it says Saurez can't get rid of the chimp inside'

their defence is that it didn't leave any bite marks (" I don't see him closing his mouth and performing a bite in the true sense of the word. It is more like a gnaw") but Barton didn't leave any marks or cause any damage at all with his half hearted punches against City

I think they have taken his previous offences into consideration, as they did with Barton.