Sometimes being banned from posting on The Guardian is a hardship.

For instance, this chap's complaint about being made to feel like a scrounger because of his disability is very sad and everything, but - due to being banned - I'm unable to satisfy my deep-seated urge to ask whether he is perhaps perceived as a scrounger due to having short arms and deep pockets

I don't suppose someone else with an account on there would do it for me? :-(

https://www.theguardian.com/society/...p-benefits-cut

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Burney

For instance, this chap's complaint about being made to feel like a scrounger because of his disability is very sad and everything, but - due to being banned - I'm unable to satisfy my deep-seated urge to ask whether he is perhaps perceived as a scrounger due to having short arms and deep pockets

I don't suppose someone else with an account on there would do it for me? :-(


https://www.theguardian.com/society/...p-benefits-cut

---

Nice......

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Burney

For instance, this chap's complaint about being made to feel like a scrounger because of his disability is very sad and everything, but - due to being banned - I'm unable to satisfy my deep-seated urge to ask whether he is perhaps perceived as a scrounger due to having short arms and deep pockets

I don't suppose someone else with an account on there would do it for me? :-(

https://www.theguardian.com/society/...p-benefits-cut

---

Did you read this?

https://www.theguardian.com/commenti...alk-out-on-her

Beyond parody is not even the start of it.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Monty92

Did you read this?

https://www.theguardian.com/commenti...alk-out-on-her

Beyond parody is not even the start of it.

---

Yes. They did actually print the text of Shriver's wholly rational and intelligent speech yesterday, but decided to double down on the stupidity by publishing another piece defending cultural appropriation today.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Burney

Yes. They did actually print the text of Shriver's wholly rational and intelligent speech yesterday, but decided to double down on the stupidity by publishing another piece defending cultural appropriation today.

---

I wonder if it's a coincidence that they're reached peak Guardian at the same time they've started going cap in hand to readers. Almost as if they're saying "Look! Look at the unmitigated *******s we're having to publish to pull in more readers as our business model falls further down the ****ter! Help us!"

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Monty92

I wonder if it's a coincidence that they're reached peak Guardian at the same time they've started going cap in hand to readers. Almost as if they're saying "Look! Look at the unmitigated *******s we're having to publish to pull in more readers as our business model falls further down the ****ter! Help us!"

---

Possibly. Eventually their only realistic business model will be to go behind a paywall and cater purely for left-wing lunatics who never want any reality to intrude on their news or comment.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Monty92

Did you read this?

https://www.theguardian.com/commenti...alk-out-on-her

Beyond parody is not even the start of it.

---

I can't actually read that m - the self-indulgent bull**** of the intro means I can't get to the actual meat (can I say meat in this context) of her argument. What the flying **** is she on about?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Luis Anaconda

I can't actually read that m - the self-indulgent bull**** of the intro means I can't get to the actual meat (can I say meat in this context) of her argument. What the flying **** is she on about?

---

Basically, a white person shouldn't write about the fictional experiences of a black person because racism

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Monty92

Basically, a white person shouldn't write about the fictional experiences of a black person because racism

---

ty
What utter bull****

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Luis Anaconda

ty
What utter bull****

---

Yes. The argument is very effectively dismantled by the very speech to which she chose not to listen. Which, I guess, is why she walked out.

https://www.theguardian.com/commenti...-a-passing-fad